首页> 外文会议>Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, 1996. Proceedings., Third IEEE Workshop on >Subjective and objective evaluation of two types of dialogues in acall assistance service
【24h】

Subjective and objective evaluation of two types of dialogues in acall assistance service

机译:主观和客观评价两种对话形式呼叫协助服务

获取原文

摘要

Menu-based or system driven dialogues are widely used ininterfaces to telephone services. The communication structure theyimpose on the customer differs from human-human dialogues, where controland initiative can switch from one partner to the other. It has oftenbeen claimed that mixed initiative dialogues could improve the userfriendliness and efficiency of spoken language interfaces. In this paperwe investigate whether mixed initiative dialogues do indeed outperformsystem driven dialogues as interface to a relatively simple service,i.e. a call assistance service that gives access to a small number ofcompanies and agencies through a single premium rate access number.Results show that mixed initiative dialogues are not faster, nor morecomfortable than system driven dialogues, at least in this service. Wediscuss possible explanations for our findings
机译:基于菜单或系统驱动的对话被广泛用于 与电话服务的接口。他们的沟通结构 强加于客户不同于人与人之间的对话 主动性可以从一个伙伴切换到另一个伙伴。它经常 声称混合主动对话可以改善用户 口语界面的友好性和效率。在本文中 我们调查混合主动对话是否确实表现出色 系统驱动的对话作为相对简单服务的接口, 即呼叫协助服务,可以访问少量的 公司和代理商通过一个溢价率访问号码。 结果表明,混合主动对话不会更快,也不会更多 比系统驱动的对话更舒适,至少在此服务中如此。我们 讨论我们发现的可能解释

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号