首页> 外文会议>Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, 1996. Proceedings., Third IEEE Workshop on >Subjective and objective evaluation of two types of dialogues in a call assistance service
【24h】

Subjective and objective evaluation of two types of dialogues in a call assistance service

机译:呼叫协助服务中两种类型的对话的主观和客观评估

获取原文

摘要

Menu-based or system driven dialogues are widely used in interfaces to telephone services. The communication structure they impose on the customer differs from human-human dialogues, where control and initiative can switch from one partner to the other. It has often been claimed that mixed initiative dialogues could improve the user friendliness and efficiency of spoken language interfaces. In this paper we investigate whether mixed initiative dialogues do indeed outperform system driven dialogues as interface to a relatively simple service, i.e. a call assistance service that gives access to a small number of companies and agencies through a single premium rate access number. Results show that mixed initiative dialogues are not faster, nor more comfortable than system driven dialogues, at least in this service. We discuss possible explanations for our findings.
机译:基于菜单或系统驱动的对话被广泛用于电话服务的接口。他们强加给客户的沟通结构不同于人与人之间的对话,人与人之间的对话可以使控制和主动权从一个伙伴切换到另一个伙伴。人们经常声称,混合主动对话可以提高用户友好性和口语界面的效率。在本文中,我们研究了混合主动对话是否确实确实胜过了系统驱动的对话,因为它是相对简单的服务(即呼叫协助服务)的接口,该服务可以通过单个溢价率访问号码访问少数公司和代理商。结果表明,至少在此服务中,混合主动对话不会比系统驱动的对话更快,更舒适。我们讨论了我们发现的可能解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号