首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008 38th Annual >Drowning in method, thirsty for values: A call for cultural inquiry
【24h】

Drowning in method, thirsty for values: A call for cultural inquiry

机译:沉溺于方法,渴求价值:呼吁进行文化探究

获取原文

摘要

A decade or more has passed since publication of most calls for reform in engineering education. In the ensuing time, there has been significant work on the design, implementation, and transferability of appropriate methods and techniques - accompanied by, in most cases, little discussion of the values and beliefs of the people involved. But many theories of change rely on a fundamental shift in human beliefs and values, and purport that institutionalization of methods is impossible without this shift. Given this, now may be a reasonable time to re-visit the questions: What are the values of people involved in engineering education, and are our educational reform efforts considering these values throughout the curriculum design process? In this paper, we examine several models for engineering educational reform, with a particular focus on the role of individual values in determining responses to change. We highlight the importance of developing understandings of individual perspectives and social context. We contrast a user-oriented approach to curriculum design with common scenarios of curriculum design practice, and we argue that, in many cases, successes in curricular change can be traced to employment of user-centered approaches.
机译:自从在工程教育改革的大多数呼吁发布以来,已经通过了十年或更长时间。在随后的时间内,在适当的方法和技术的设计,实施和可转移性方面存在重大工作 - 在大多数情况下,伴随着对所涉及的人民的价值观和信仰的讨论很少。但是,许多改变的理论依赖于人类信仰和价值观的基本转变,并散开这种转变的制度化是不可能的。鉴于这一点,现在可能是重新访问问题的合理时间:参与工程教育的人的价值是什么,是我们在整个课程设计过程中考虑这些价值的教育改革努力?在本文中,我们研究了几个用于工程教育改革的模型,特别关注个人价值在确定变革的反应时的作用。我们强调了制定对个人观点和社会背景的理解的重要性。与课程设计实践的常见情景对比具有课程设计的面向用户的方法,我们认为,在许多情况下,课程变化的成功可以追溯到使用用户中心的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号