首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Possible Benefits and Adverse Effects of Fluoridation in England, 2018 Public Health England Report
【24h】

Possible Benefits and Adverse Effects of Fluoridation in England, 2018 Public Health England Report

机译:2018年英国公共卫生报告中氟化在英国可能带来的好处和不利影响

获取原文

摘要

The protective effect of community water fluoridation (CWF) on caries has been well demonstrated and relationships with adverse health outcomes have also been alleged. We have recently completed a study of the association between concentrations of fluoride in public water supplies (PWS) and dental caries indicators, as well as several adverse non-dental health-outcomes in England, using recent available routine surveillance data. The methods and results are presented in more detail in other talks at this meeting. The benefits in terms on reduction of caries from CWF are clearly supported by our results, and there was strong interaction with socio-economic status. For example, comparing children in areas with a fluoridation scheme and >0.7mg/l fluoride to low areas with <0.2mg/l fluoride, there are 17% less with caries in the least deprived areas, rising to 28% in the most deprived areas. For non-dental outcomes, we found some associations between fluoride and fractures (adverse) and bladder cancer (protective). However in both cases the pattern of results, especially the lack of a dose response pattern across exposure, suggested a non-causal association. It was concluded that these findings were consistent with water fluoridation being an effective and safe public health measure, in areas with fluoride concentration up to 1 mg/l, to reduce dental caries and reduce dental health inequalities. In reaching this conclusion, the study team balanced both the magnitude of the dental and non-dental effects, and the strength of evidence in terms of internal coherence and consistency with other evidence. Most studies showing adverse effects are at much higher fluoride concentrations and extrapolation to lower concentrations is very uncertain. Some endpoints such as endocrine (thyroid) and neurological (IQ) for exposure up to 1 mg/l could not be addressed in this study, and still need addressing.
机译:社区水氟化物(CWF)对龋齿的保护作用已得到充分证明,并且也被认为与不良健康后果有关。我们最近使用常规监测数据完成了一项关于公共供水中的氟化物浓度与龋齿指标以及英格兰若干不良非牙科健康结局之间关系的研究。该方法和结果将在本次会议的其他演讲中更详细地介绍。我们的结果清楚地证明了减少CWF龋齿带来的好处,并且与社会经济地位有着密切的相互作用。例如,将氟化方案和氟化物> 0.7mg / l的儿童与氟化物含量<0.2mg / l的低儿童进行比较,最贫困的地区患龋的儿童减少了17%,而最贫困的地区患龋的儿童上升了28%地区。对于非牙科治疗的结果,我们发现氟化物与骨折(不良)和膀胱癌(保护性)之间存在某些关联。但是,在这两种情况下,结果的模式,尤其是整个暴露过程中均未出现剂量反应模式,表明存在非因果关系。结论是,这些发现与氟化物浓度高达1 mg / l的区域中的水氟化物是一种有效且安全的公共卫生措施相一致,以减少龋齿并减少牙齿健康方面的不平等现象。在得出这一结论时,研究团队在牙科效果和非牙科效果的大小以及内部一致性和与其他证据的一致性方面的证据强度之间取得了平衡。大多数研究表明,在较高的氟化物浓度下会产生不利影响,并且很难推断出较低的氟化物浓度。本研究无法解决暴露至1 mg / l的某些终点(例如内分泌(甲状腺)和神经系统(IQ)),仍然需要解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号