【24h】

How Green Is Green? Modeling Urban Greenness Exposure in Environmental Health Research

机译:绿色是多少?在环境健康研究中模拟城市绿色暴露

获取原文

摘要

Exposure to greenness has several health benefits, yet analyses are limited by uncertainty about accuracy of greenness metrics, often derived from different remotely-sensed data sources and using different spatial methods. This research (1) assesses the strengths and weaknesses of multiple greenness data sources and metrics for application in environmental health research, and (2) develops and tests an alternative greenness exposure metric that can be applied worldwide. Methods: We analyzed 5 data sources: Landsat time series, Landsat 8, Sentinel-2, RapidEye, and the Green View Index (GVI), derived from Google Street View. These data sets span various time series, resolutions and costs, and represent aerial and perspective views. We compared the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) using different imagery types and the GVI for various buffer distances around postal codes and examined sensitivity to spatial metrics and data sources. Based on these analyses, we constructed a spatially-weighted greenness metric combining data from Sentinel-2 and the GVI that incorporates neighbourhood street-level and at-home greenness. Results: NDVI showed correlations of between 0.65 and 0.85 among satellite types and demonstrated significant inter-variability. GVI showed low correlations with all other data types (0.25-0.40), suggesting an important new source of greenness data. Metrics were spatially sensitive, particularly at small distances and high resolutions, but lacked temporal sensitivity. Initial analyses suggest that the proposed metric is superior to traditional measures that overestimate neighbourhood greenness exposure and underestimate at-home exposure. Conclusions: This research is the first comparison of multiple remote sensing data sources and metrics, including both aerial and novel perspective views. It presents an alternative greenness exposure metric based on freely accessible data sources that may be applied in public health research internationally.
机译:暴露于绿色对健康有好处,但分析的不确定性通常取决于来自不同遥感数据源和使用不同空间方法的绿色度量标准的准确性。这项研究(1)评估了在环境健康研究中应用的多个绿色数据源和度量标准的优缺点,以及(2)开发和测试了可在全球范围内应用的替代性绿色暴露度量。方法:我们分析了5个数据源:Landsat时间序列,Landsat 8,Sentinel-2,RapidEye和从Google Street View导出的Green View Index(GVI)。这些数据集涵盖各种时间序列,分辨率和成本,并代表了鸟瞰图和透视图。我们比较了不同图像类型的归一化植被指数(NDVI)和GVI对邮政编码周围各种缓冲区距离的影响,并研究了对空间度量和数据源的敏感性。基于这些分析,我们构建了一个空间加权的绿色度量标准,该度量标准结合了Sentinel-2和GVI的数据,并结合了邻里街道级和家庭绿色度量。结果:NDVI显示卫星类型之间的相关性在0.65至0.85之间,并显示出显着的互变性。 GVI与所有其他数据类型(0.25-0.40)的相关性较低,表明绿色数据的重要新来源。度量对空间敏感,尤其是在小距离和高分辨率时,但缺乏时间敏感性。初步分析表明,拟议的指标优于传统方法,后者高估了邻里绿色暴露程度,而低估了家庭暴露程度。结论:这项研究是多个遥感数据源和度量标准的首次比较,包括航空和新型透视图。它提供了基于可自由访问的数据源的替代性绿色暴露度量标准,该度量标准可能会在国际公共卫生研究中应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号