首页> 外文会议>Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, Inc.;SPWLA annual logging symposium >CEMENT BOND EVALUATION WITH A LOGGING-WHILE-DRILLING SONIC TOOL
【24h】

CEMENT BOND EVALUATION WITH A LOGGING-WHILE-DRILLING SONIC TOOL

机译:随钻测井声波测井仪评价水泥胶结

获取原文

摘要

A cement bond log (CBL) plays an important role when evaluating the quality of cement behind casing and determining well integrity, which in turn helps to ensure zonal isolation and wellbore protection. Logging-while-drilling (LWD) sonic tools provide an economical solution for locating the top of cement and determining the cement bond index, particularly for highly deviated wells due to the ease of conveyance. In general, LWD tools can make time-lapse measurements and save rig time and cost by eliminating separate wireline runs. However, LWD sonic measurements are often contaminated by the tool-borne wave mode and road noise, resulting in biased casing wave amplitude and attenuation estimates. Using these biased measurements directly can yield an unreliable bond index (BI), particularly for zones where the tool-borne waves are significantly stronger than casing arrivals. These challenges can be overcome as demonstrated in a field data example with both free casing and well-bonded zones.The paper describes a quantitative cement evaluation method developed using LWD monopole data. The method uses the characteristics of LWD sonic tools—the tool waves have an intrinsic stop band in excitation, and the tool mode speed is slower than the casing wave.During the first step of the process, band-pass filters are developed and applied to extract casing waves in the intrinsic stop band of the tool mode. The waveforms of a single-shot data recorded by different receivers are then stacked to a reference receiver with different weights to further suppress the tool-borne wave arrivals and increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the desired signals. The weights are calculated according to the speed differences between the casing and tool waves. The remaining tool waves after the array processing are predicted by multi-shot data, including both a free-casing zone and a well-bonded zone. A simplified tool-casing wave model is developed and applied to describe and predict the interference phenomenon between the casing arrival and the tool arrival. The tool wave signals are calculated from the well-bonded data by subtracting the casing wave predictions calculated from the free-casing data with modeling predictions. The true casing wave amplitude is estimated from the filtered waveforms and calibrated by subtracting the tool wave predictions. A BI log is then calculated from the calibrated casing wave amplitude.This new processing technique was applied to a field data example exhibiting both free-casing and well-bonded zones. Both the CBL amplitude in dB and BI log are extracted from the LWD sonic data and compared with BI estimated from a wireline segmented bond tool (SBT). A good match is obtained over the entire log despite the fact that a casing pressure test was conducted between the acquisition of the LWD sonic and wireline data, which might have created micro-annuli detected by the SBT measurements.The proposed approach promises to be a significant step toward deriving a quantitative CBL from LWD sonic monopole data.
机译:在评估套管后的水泥质量并确定井的完整性时,水泥胶结测井(CBL)起着重要作用,这反过来又有助于确保区域隔离和井筒保护。随钻测井(LWD)声波工具提供了一种经济的解决方案,用于定位水泥的顶部并确定水泥的粘结指数,特别是由于易于运输,因此对于高度偏斜的井而言尤其如此。通常,LWD工具可以进行时延测量并通过消除单独的电缆运行来节省钻机时间和成本。但是,随钻测井的声音测量结果经常被工具传播的波模式和道路噪声所污染,从而导致套管波振幅和衰减估计值出现偏差。直接使用这些有偏差的测量值会产生不可靠的粘结指数(BI),尤其是对于那些工具传播的波明显强于套管到达波的区域。如在具有自由套管和粘结良好区域的现场数据示例中所示,可以克服这些挑战。 本文介绍了使用随钻测井单极子数据开发的定量水泥评价方法。该方法利用了随钻测井(LWD)声波工具的特性,即工具波在激励中具有固有的阻带,并且工具模式的速度比套管波慢。 在该过程的第一步中,开发了带通滤波器并将其应用于在工具模式的固有阻带中提取套管波。然后,将由不同接收器记录的单次数据的波形堆叠到具有不同权重的参考接收器,以进一步抑制工具传播的波到达并增加所需信号的信噪比(SNR)。根据套管波与工具波之间的速度差计算重量。阵列处理后剩余的工具波由多次射击数据预测,包括自由套管区和粘结良好的区。建立了简化的工具套管波模型,并将其应用于描述和预测套管到达与工具到达之间的干扰现象。通过从自由套管数据中计算得到的套管波预测值与建模预测值相减,可以从粘结良好的数据中计算出工具波信号。真实的套管波幅值是从滤波后的波形中估算出来的,并通过减去工具波预测值进行校准。然后从校准后的套管波振幅中计算出一个BI log。 这项新的处理技术被应用于具有自由套管和粘结良好区域的现场数据示例。从随钻测井声波数据中提取以dB为单位的CBL幅值和BI log,并将其与由有线分段粘结工具(SBT)估算的BI进行比较。尽管在LWD声波数据和电缆数据的采集之间进行了套管压力测试,但在整个测井曲线上仍取得了很好的匹配,这可能已经产生了由SBT测量检测到的微环形空间。 拟议的方法有望成为从随钻测井声波单极子数据推导定量CBL的重要一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号