首页> 外文会议>Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers;SPIE Medical Imaging Conference >Mammographic breast density classification using a deep neural network: Assessment based on inter-observer variability
【24h】

Mammographic breast density classification using a deep neural network: Assessment based on inter-observer variability

机译:使用深度神经网络的乳房X线乳腺密度分类:基于观察者间差异的评估

获取原文

摘要

Mammographic breast density is an important risk marker in breast cancer screening. The ACR BI-RADSguidelines (5th ed.) dene four breast density categories that can be dichotomized by the two super-classesdense" and ot dense". Due to the qualitative description of the categories, density assessment by radiologistsis characterized by a high inter-observer variability.To quantify this variability, we compute the overall percentage agreement (OPA) and Cohen's kappa of 32radiologists to the panel majority vote based on the two super-classes. Further, we analyze the OPA betweenindividual radiologists and compare the performances to an automated assessment via a convolutional neuralnetwork (CNN). The data used for evaluation contains 600 breast cancer screening examinations with four viewseach. The CNN was designed to take all views of an examination as input and trained on a dataset with 7186cases to output one of the two super-classes.The highest agreement to the panel majority vote (PMV) achieved by a single radiologist is 99%, the lowestscore is 71% with a mean of 89%. The OPA of two individual radiologists ranges from a maximum of 97.5% toa minimum of 50.5% with a mean of 83%. Cohen's kappa values of radiologists to the PMV range from 0.97 to0.47 with a mean of 0.77. The presented algorithm reaches an OPA to all 32 radiologists of 88% and a kappa of0.75.Our results show that inter-observer variability for breast density assessment is high even if the problem isreduced to two categories and that our convolutional neural network can provide labelling comparable to anaverage radiologist. We also discuss how to deal with automated classication methods for subjective tasks.
机译:乳腺钼靶X光检查是乳腺癌筛查的重要风险标志。 ACR BI-RADS 指南(第5版)定义了四个超级类别可以分为的四个乳房密度类别 \ dense“和\” not density“。由于类别的定性描述,放射线医生进行了密度评估 观察者之间的差异很大。 为了量化这种可变性,我们计算了总体百分比一致性(OPA)和Cohen的kappa为32 放射专家以小组的两个超级类别进行投票。此外,我们分析了 各个放射科医生,并通过卷积神经将其性能与自动评估进行比较 网络(CNN)。用于评估的数据包含600种乳腺癌筛查检查,其中有四种视图 每个。 CNN的设计目的是将检查的所有视图作为输入并在7186的数据集上进行训练 用例输出两个超类之一。 一位放射科医生对专家小组多数票(PMV)达成的最高协议是99%,最低的是 得分为71%,平均得分为89%。两名放射线医师的OPA范围最大为97.5%至 最低为50.5%,平均为83%。放射科医师对PMV的科恩卡帕值介于0.97至 0.47,平均值为0.77。提出的算法可为所有32位放射科医生提供88%的OPA和 0.75。 我们的结果表明,即使问题是 归结为两类,我们的卷积神经网络可以提供与 普通放射科医生。我们还将讨论如何处理主观任务的自动分类方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号