首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference;International Association for Energy Economics >WILL SHUTTING DOWN ALL COAL-FIRED POWERPLANTS IN BEIJING MAKES A REAL DIFFERENCE? AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT
【24h】

WILL SHUTTING DOWN ALL COAL-FIRED POWERPLANTS IN BEIJING MAKES A REAL DIFFERENCE? AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT

机译:会否关闭北京所有燃煤电厂的差异?综合评估

获取原文

摘要

OverviewBeijing, where air pollution and the associated health impacts has become the major concerns for the localgovernment, has shut down its last coal-fired power plant in March, 2017. With that, Beijing became the first city inChina to rely entirely on cleaner energy sources like natural gas for its electricity generation. Previous studies havesuggested that the marginal damage caused by the air pollutants vary acorss space, which is affected by the locationof the sources. However, few studies have estimated the marginal damages from the power plants in China, and thespatial distribution of the health impacts. To fill this gap, this study builds an integrated assessment model toestimate the maringal damages of PM2.5 emissions from all power plants in and around Beijing (Beijing-Tianjin-Heibeijing area, which will be referred to as BTH area in the following text). Then, based on the marginal damagesestimation, the aggregate benefits of this coal power elimination actions will be calculated. Meanwhile, suggestionson which are the coal-fired power plants to be shut down in the next stage of actions will be provided.MethodsTo capture the linkage between emissions and the damages, an integrated assessment model called Integrated AirPollution Impact Assessment Model or China (APIAC) has been developed. The model consists of four modules: anemission inventory, an air quality module, an exposure and effects module and an valuation module. APIAC beginswith an emission inventory of all power plants and other import air pollution sources in BTH area. Then a air qualitymodel based on Gaussian plume model is used to model the transport of emissions across space. Next, the exposturesand health impacts to humans of each pollutants are calculated. And finally the physical effects are expressed indollar terms using results from non-market valuation studies in the economics literature.To obtain the marginal damages of each source, we have two runs of the model experiments. In this study, APIAC isfirst fun using the current levels of emissions in the BTH area to calculate the background level of damages. We thenadd a small stream of emissions over time at a specific source and recalculate aggregate damages. Because all otherfactors in the model are held constant, the change in damages is strictly attributable to the change in emissions fromthe source. We perform this experiment for every source in BTH area.ResultsThe marginal health effects of all coal power plants in BTH area are shown in Figure 1. Each of the circulerepresents a coal-fired power plant, and the size of the circule represents the magnitude of the marginal healthimpacts from the emissions at that source. The larger the circule, the larger the marginal health impacts. As is shownby the figure, the coal power plants that are shut down have the largest marginal health impacts. Among all the 38coal-fired powerplants in BTH area, the marginal health effects ranges from 282 $/tons to 1534 $/ton. And the coalfiredpowerplants with the larger marginal health effects are mostly located near Beijing, where the populationdensity is high.The spatial distribution of the health impacts from emissions by power plants that are shut down in Beijing areshown in Figure 2. Apparently, people who live in Beijing and other areas that are upwind direction of Beijing willbenefit most from the action.ConclusionsAccording to the marginal health impacts estimation, the six power plants shut down in Beijing are actually thelargest marginal health impacts contributor, due to their proximity to the urban areas where population density arehigh and their downwind locations. The marginal health impacts for the six powerplants that are shut down arerespectively 1350, 994, 644, 1534, 1133 and 1462 $/ton PM2.5 emission. People who live in Beijing and the upwinddirection of Beijing will benefit most from the action. And other power plants with high marginal health impacts,including Sanhe Power Station, Panshan Power Station, Shalingzi Power Station will be recommended to be shutdown in the next round of actions so that the local residents will benefit most.
机译:概述 北京,空气污染及其相关的健康影响已成为当地人的主要关注点 政府已于2017年3月关闭了其最后一座燃煤发电厂。北京因此成为北京的第一座城市。 中国完全依靠天然气等清洁能源发电。以前的研究有 建议由空气污染物引起的边际损害随空间的变化而变化,这受位置的影响 的来源。但是,很少有研究估算出中国发电厂的边际损失,以及 对健康影响的空间分布。为了填补这一空白,本研究建立了一个综合评估模型,以 估算北京及其周边地区所有发电厂的PM2.5排放对海洋造成的破坏(北京-天津- 河北北区,在下文中称为BTH区。然后,根据边际损失 估算时,将计算出该煤电消除行动的总收益。同时,建议 将提供下一步行动中将关闭的燃煤电厂。 方法 为了捕获排放与损害之间的联系,采用了一种称为“综合空气”的综合评估模型 已经开发了污染影响评估模型或中国(APIAC)。该模型包含四个模块: 排放清单,空气质量模块,暴露和影响模块以及评估模块。 APIAC开始 以及BTH地区所有发电厂和其他进口空气污染源的排放清单。然后是空气质量 使用基于高斯羽状模型的模型对排放物在空间中的传输进行建模。接下来,曝光 并计算出每种污染物对人类的健康影响。最后,物理效应表示为 使用经济学文献中非市场估值研究的结果得出的美元条款。 为了获得每个来源的边际损害,我们进行了两次模型实验。在这项研究中,APIAC是 使用BTH区域当前的排放水平来计算损害的背景水平是第一个有趣的事情。然后我们 随时间增加特定来源的一小部分排放量,并重新计算总损失。因为所有其他 模型中的因素保持不变,损害的变化严格归因于来自 来源。我们对BTH区域中的每个来源执行此实验。 结果 BTH地区所有燃煤电厂的边际健康影响如图1所示。 代表燃煤发电厂,循环的大小代表边际健康的程度 来自该源排放的影响。循环越大,对边缘健康的影响越大。如图所示 从图中可以看出,关闭的燃煤电厂对健康的边际影响最大。在所有38个之中 BTH地区的燃煤电厂,其边际健康影响范围从282美元/吨到1534美元/吨。和燃煤 边际健康影响较大的发电厂大多位于北京附近,那里的人口 密度高。 北京关闭的电厂排放的健康影响的空间分布是 如图2所示。显然,居住在北京以及北京上风向的其他地区的人会 从行动中受益最大。 结论 根据边际健康影响估算,北京关闭的六个发电厂实际上是 最大的边际健康影响因素,因为它们靠近人口密度大的城市地区 高处及其顺风位置。被关闭的六个发电厂对健康的边际影响是 PM2.5排放分别为1350、994、644、1534、1133和1462美元/吨。住在北京和上风的人 行动将使北京的方向受益最大。和其他对边际健康有高影响的发电厂, 建议关闭三河电站,盘山电站,沙岭子电站 下轮行动将使当地居民受益最多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号