首页> 外文会议>ECEEE summer study >A spanner in the works? Are ambitious energy efficiency policy objectives frustrated by the standardisation processes or can ambitious technical standards accelerate progress?
【24h】

A spanner in the works? Are ambitious energy efficiency policy objectives frustrated by the standardisation processes or can ambitious technical standards accelerate progress?

机译:作品中的扳手?雄心勃勃的能源效率政策目标受到标准化流程的挫败,还是可以雄心勃勃的技术标准加速进展?

获取原文

摘要

International technical standards can be instrumental in creating global markets for efficient energy technologies. Technical standards play an important and growing role in support of energy efficiency performance requirement and labelling programs for appliances and equipment. The growth in the scope of standards and labelling (S&L) programs globally, together with calls for greater harmonization, has reduced the use of local test methods and increased reliance on international test methods. Energy efficiency has typically not been a key consideration in the development of technical standards but over recent years several government-led initiatives have attempted to make standards more appropriate to their policy ambitions. The improvement of test methods and inclusion of energy performance tiers as informative guidelines within international technical standards are amongst these initiatives. While not mandatory, the latter have been seen as a means of limiting the number of different performance requirements called up by government S&L programs, leading to reduced compliance costs. There may also be benefits for developing countries that do not necessarily have the resources to develop their own performance requirements. If sufficiently ambitious, performance tiers could also inform on successive updates of requirements for countries with established programs. However, some governments and experts query the wisdom of such approaches, which they say provide industrial lobbyists with the opportunity to limit minimum energy performance requirements at an un-ambitious level. Many governments are also concerned about the lack of a formalised structure within international standardisation processes to take account of policy ambitions. The slow pace of international standardisations may also be frustrating to national governments and potentially incompatible with local policy roadmaps. This paper will describe several recent successful, as well as unsuccessful, experiences with using international standards to advance energy efficiency for products. It will also discuss the pros and cons of this approach and identify a range of potential solutions that will make it more likely for governments to realize their policy ambitions.
机译:国际技术标准可以有助于为高效能源技术创造全球市场。技术标准在支持电器和设备的能效性能要求和标签方案的支持下发挥着重要和日益增长的作用。在全球标准和标签(S&L)方案的范围内的增长与呼吁更加统一,减少了当地测试方法的使用,并增加了对国际测试方法的依赖。能效通常不是技术标准发展中的关键考虑因素,但近年来,几个政府主任的举措试图使标准更适合其政策野心。在国际技术标准中提高测试方法和能源性能层的纳入能力指南是这些举措。虽然不是强制性的,后者被视为限制了政府S&L计划所需的不同绩效要求的数量,导致遵守合规成本。发展中国家也可能有福利,这些国家不一定有资源开发自己的绩效要求。如果足够雄心勃勃的,性能层也可以告知既定计划的国家的连续要求。但是,一些政府和专家查询了这些方法的智慧,他们说,他们说提供工业游说者,有机会限制在雄心勃勃的水平上限制最低能源绩效要求。许多政府也关注国际标准化流程中缺乏正式的结构,以考虑到政策野心。国际标准化的缓慢可能也可能对国家政府令人沮丧,并且可能与当地政策路线图可能不相容。本文将描述几个最近的成功,以及使用国际标准来推进产品的能效的经验。它还将讨论这种方法的利弊,并确定一系列潜在的解决方案,使各国政府更有可能实现其政策野心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号