首页> 外文会议>AEIT International Annual Conference >The 2.0 Cost Benefit Analysis and its Application to the National Development Plan 2017 - Methodology for evaluating electricity grid projects' benefits: current status and further improvements
【24h】

The 2.0 Cost Benefit Analysis and its Application to the National Development Plan 2017 - Methodology for evaluating electricity grid projects' benefits: current status and further improvements

机译:2.0成本效益分析及其在国家发展计划的应用 - 2017 - 评估电网项目的福利的方法论:现状和进一步改进

获取原文

摘要

Since 2005, Terna have applied a technical-economic evaluation of the main electrical infrastructure planned in the National Development Plan by using a Cost-Benefit methodology based on the comparison of discounted costs and benefits. That evaluation have allowed the profitability index (IP) estimation in order to quantify and qualify the system utility. On 2013, Terna have undertaken a review of the Cost-Benefit methodology for the infrastructure evaluation in order to improve the information transparency. The new methodology (called ACB 2.0) has been deliberated on 4th November 2016 b y the National Authority (AEEGSI 627/16/eel/r) and it is resulted in the following set of documents and actions: 1. Annex n.3 to the NDP 2015: Development of the Cost-Benefit Analysis; 2. Appendix C to the AEEGSI's Consultation Document dated 1st October 2015 and related Terna's feedbacks dated 3rd February 2016; 3. ENTSO-E's Guideline for Cost Benefit Analysis of Grid Development Projects dated February 2015; 4. ACER opinion n.01/2014 dated 30 January 2014 regarding Guideline for Cost Benefit Analysis of Grid Development Projects ENTSO-E; 5. ENTSO-E's Guideline for Cost Benefit Analysis of Grid Development Projects, version dated 29 July 2016 published and submitted to ACER. The ACB 2.0 has been applied the 1st time to the NDP 2017 evaluating for all the investment projects - which CapEx is more than 25 M{EUR} - the benefits for the electrical system. The first section of the paper provides an introduction on the perimeter of the analysis and the identification of benefit category, including the way to monetize them (where applicable). The second section presents the methodology applied to a few study cases, identifying benefits and its evaluation, System Utility Index (SUI similar to the known PI) and Net Present Value (NPV). The third section deals with the area in which Terna is investigating to catch further benefits introducing new category of benefits (not only electrical) that can be monetized in a next future. The last part of the paper includes some concluding remarks.
机译:自2005年以来,泰尔纳通过使用基于折扣成本和福利的比较来应用通过使用成本效益的方法来应用计划在国家发展计划中的主要电气基础设施的技术经济评估。该评估允许盈利指数(IP)估计,以便量化和验证系统效用。 2013年,泰尔纳已经开展了对基础设施评估的成本效益方法的审查,以改善信息透明度。新方法(称为ACB 2.0)于2016年11月4日审议国家当局(AEEGSI 627/16 / EEL / R)审议,导致以下文件和行动:1.附件N.3至NDP 2015:开发成本效益分析; 2. Apendix C到AEEGSI的咨询文件2015年10月1日及相关泰尔纳的反馈日期为2016年2月3日; 3. Erento-E 2015年2月的网格开发项目成本效益分析的成本效益分析指南; 4.宏碁意见N.01 / 2014年1月30日2014年1月30日关于网格开发项目的成本效益分析指南entso-e; 5. entso-e网格开发项目的成本效益分析指南,版本日期为2016年7月29日发表并提交给宏碁。 ACB 2.0已应用于所有投资项目的NDP 2017年第一次评估 - 其中CAPEX超过25米(EUR} - 电气系统的益处。本文的第一部分在分析的周边和效益类别的识别上提供了介绍,包括将其货币化的方式(在适用的情况下)。第二部分提出了应用于一些研究案例的方法,确定益处及其评估,系统实用性指数(SUI类似于已知PI的SUI)和净现值(NPV)。第三部分涉及Terna正在调查的区域,以捕获进一步的福利,引入新的福利(不仅电气)可以在下一个未来被货币被货币。本文的最后一部分包括一些结论备注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号