首页> 外文会议>IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management >Artificial Swarms find Social Optima : (Late Breaking Report)
【24h】

Artificial Swarms find Social Optima : (Late Breaking Report)

机译:人为群体发现社交最优:(迟到的报告)

获取原文

摘要

In the natural world, many social species amplify their collective intelligence by forming real-time closed-loop systems. Referred to as Swarm Intelligence (SI), this phenomenon has been rigorously studied in schools of fish, flocks of birds, and swarms of bees. In recent years, technology has enabled human groups to form real-time closed-loop systems modeled after natural swarms and moderated by AI algorithms. Referred to as Artificial Swarm Intelligence (ASI), these methods have been shown to enable human groups to reach optimized decisions. The present research explores this further, testing if ASI enables groups with conflicting views to converge on socially optimal solutions. Results showed that “swarming” was significantly more effective at enabling groups to converge on the Social Optima than three common voting methods: (i) Plurality voting (i) Borda Count and (iii) Condorcet pairwise voting. While traditional voting methods converged on socially optimal solutions with 60% success across a test set of 100 questions, the ASI system converged on socially optimal solutions with 82% success (p<;0.001).
机译:在自然界中,许多社交物种通过形成实时闭环系统来扩大其集体智能。被称为群体智力(SI),这种现象在鱼类,鸟群和蜜蜂的群体中已经严格研究过。近年来,技术使人类组织能够形成自然群体后建模的实时闭环系统,并通过AI算法进行调节。被称为人为群智能(ASI),已显示这些方法使人类群体能够达到优化的决策。本研究进一步探讨了这一研究,测试ASI是否使得具有相互冲突的观点来汇聚在社交最佳解决方案中的群体。结果表明,“铺天盖地”是在使群体收敛于社会的Optima超过三种常见的投票方式显著更有效:(一)多数表决(I)博尔达计数及(iii)两两孔多塞投票。虽然传统的投票方法融合在一个关于100个问题的测试集中的60 %成功的社交最优解决方案中,但ASI系统融合在具有82 %的成功(P <; 0.001)的社交最佳解决方案上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号