首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Design Test of Integrated Micro Nano-Systems >Tuning Range Comparison Between Different Planar Inductors Layouts on PCB
【24h】

Tuning Range Comparison Between Different Planar Inductors Layouts on PCB

机译:PCB上不同平面电感器布局之间的调谐范围比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper aims at comparing the tuning range of three different planar inductor layouts built on a Printed Circuit Boards (PCB), namely the spiral inductor, the nonspiral inductor, and the meander inductor. Initially, we identify the equivalent electric model for the three inductors. All models are validated theoretically by analytical equations, by simulation through Sonnet software®, and also by measurements. For the same surface occupancy, the spiral inductor presents the higher inductance value, while the nonspiral inductor has the higher quality factor and self-resonant frequency. The tunability range is investigated by placing a shielding metal plate above for all PCB inductors. The inductance value is reduced, when the air gap between the metal plate and the inductance decreases. In addition, results demonstrated that the spiral inductor has the higher range, with a variation of more than 90%, followed by the non-spiral inductor. The meander one showed a change less than one-tenth of the spiral inductor.
机译:本文旨在比较构建在印刷电路板(PCB)上的三种不同平面电感器布局的调谐范围,即螺旋电感器,非螺旋电感器和曲折电感器。最初,我们确定三个电感的等效电模型。所有模型均通过解析方程式进行理论验证,并通过Sonnet软件进行仿真 ® ,也可以通过测量。对于相同的表面占有率,螺旋电感器具有较高的电感值,而非螺旋电感器具有较高的品质因数和自谐振频率。通过在所有PCB电感器上方放置一块屏蔽金属板来研究可调范围。当金属板和电感之间的气隙减小时,电感值减小。此外,结果表明,螺旋电感器具有更高的范围,变化幅度超过90%,其次是非螺旋电感器。曲折的变化小于螺旋电感的十分之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号