【24h】

CodeForTheChange at SemEval-2019 Task 8: Skip-Thoughts for Fact Checking in Community Question Answering

机译:CodeForTheChange在SemEval-2019上的任务8:跳过社区问题解答中事实检查的想法

获取原文

摘要

Community Question Answering (cQA) is one of the popular Natural Language Processing (NLP) problems being targeted by researchers across the globe. Couple of the unanswered questions in the domain of cQA are 'can we label the questions/answers as factual or not?' and 'Is the given answer by the user to a particular factual question is correct and if it is correct, can we measure the correctness and factuality of the given answer?'. We have participated in SemEval-2019 Task 8 which deals with these questions. In this paper, we present the features used, approaches followed for feature engineering, models experimented with and finally the results. Our primary submission with accuracy (official metric for SemEval Task 8) of 0.65 in Subtask B (Answer Classification) and 0.63 in Subtask A (Question Classification) stood at 6th and 16th places respectively.
机译:社区问答(cQA)是全球研究人员针对的一种流行的自然语言处理(NLP)问题。在cQA领域中,有两个悬而未决的问题是“我们可以将问题/答案标记为事实吗?”和“用户对特定事实问题的给定答案是否正确,如果正确,我们可以衡量给定答案的正确性和真实性吗?”。我们参加了处理这些问题的SemEval-2019任务8。在本文中,我们介绍了所使用的特征,特征工程遵循的方法,经过实验的模型以及最终的结果。我们在子任务B(答案分类)中的准确度(SemEval任务8的官方指标)为0.65,在子任务A(问题分类)中的准确度分别为0.65和16。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号