首页> 外文会议>AIAA SciTech forum and exposition >Large Eddy Simulation of Supersonic Combustion using the Flamelet/Progress-Variable Approach and the Evolution-Variable Manifold Approach
【24h】

Large Eddy Simulation of Supersonic Combustion using the Flamelet/Progress-Variable Approach and the Evolution-Variable Manifold Approach

机译:小火焰/进展-可变方法和演化-可变流形方法对超音速燃烧的大涡模拟

获取原文

摘要

High fidelity methods to simulate high speed turbulent combustion are of interest to the advancement of hypersonic air-breathing propulsion systems. These methods need to be cost-effective and efficient in order to be of practical use. To this end, we seeks to compare and contrast the performance of two combustion modeling approaches that may meet these criteria. The two turbulent combustion modeling approaches are the Mantelet progress/variable (FPV) and the evolution-variable manifold (EVM). Both models use tracking variables to reduce the dimensionality of the species transport equations. As a test bed, both models will be utilized to simulate a reacting transverse jet in a supersonic crossfiow. From the preliminary results, we compare OH-PLIF signals obtained from the experiment and simulations. We observe that both models exhibit similar burning regions. However, the flame structures from the EVM simulations resembled more the experimental results. For this version of the FPV model, a more sophisticated compressibility correction is needed before a complete comparison can be made.
机译:高保真度模拟高速湍流燃烧的方法是高超声速空气推进系统发展的兴趣所在。这些方法必须具有成本效益和效率,才能具有实用性。为此,我们力求比较和对比可能符合这些标准的两种燃烧建模方法的性能。两种湍流燃烧建模方法是Mantelet进度/变量(FPV)和演变变量歧管(EVM)。两种模型都使用跟踪变量来减少物种迁移方程的维数。作为试验台,这两个模型将用于模拟超音速横流中的反应性横向射流。从初步结果来看,我们比较了从实验和模拟获得的OH-PLIF信号。我们观察到两个模型都显示相似的燃烧区域。但是,来自EVM模拟的火焰结构更类似于实验结果。对于此版本的FPV模型,需要进行更复杂的可压缩性校正,然后才能进行完整比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号