首页> 外文会议>Structural Engineers Association of California Convention >San Francisco Nonductile Concrete Buildings Part Ⅱ: Analysis, Assessment and Comparison of Older San Francisco Concrete Buildings
【24h】

San Francisco Nonductile Concrete Buildings Part Ⅱ: Analysis, Assessment and Comparison of Older San Francisco Concrete Buildings

机译:旧金山非延性混凝土建筑第二部分:旧旧金山混凝土建筑的分析,评估和比较

获取原文

摘要

The building stock of large metropolitan areas comprise buildings of various materials constructed over the course of many years. A significant number of these buildings utilized concrete construction with details drastically different than modern methods of construction. For existing buildings, nonductile concrete (NDC) buildings have been identified in numerous studies as a potential seismically-vulnerable existing building type within California communities. Recently the City of San Francisco, in collaboration with the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC) Existing Buildings Committee (EBC) completed an initial inventory of all the concrete buildings in San Francisco. Based on recent inventory work, previous work by the Concrete Coalition, and retrofit experience with San Francisco buildings, there are several common pre-1980 concrete building types that can be identified in the San Francisco inventory. This paper attempts to answer several questions including: 1. How vulnerable are certain types of San Francisco concrete buildings? 2. How do different evaluation methodologies compare in identifying vulnerabilities? 3. Does one evaluation methodology stand out as being more economical or efficient in determining if a detailed building evaluation should be performed? 4. What is the potential vulnerability of the entire San Francisco pre-1980 concrete building inventory? 5. Should a potential ordinance target specific vulnerabilities (e.g. soft-story) or will fixing one vulnerability shift the problem to another part of the building (e.g. second-story columns). To answer these questions, the NDC Subcommittee of the SEAONC EBC performed analysis on typical concrete buildings constructed during certain eras using a range of analysis methodologies, including: the Hassan & Sozen Priority Index, ATC-14, ASCE 41 (Tiers 1, 2 and 3), FEMA-154, ATC-78, and FEMA P-58 implemented in the Seismic Performance Prediction Program (SP3).
机译:大型都会区的建筑群包括许多年来建造的各种材料的建筑物。这些建筑中有相当多的建筑采用了混凝土结构,其细节与现代建筑方法截然不同。对于现有建筑物,非延性混凝土(NDC)建筑物已在众多研究中确定为加利福尼亚社区内潜在的易受地震破坏的现有建筑物类型。最近,旧金山市与北加州结构工程师协会(SEAONC)现有建筑物委员会(EBC)合作完成了旧金山所有混凝土建筑物的初步清单。根据最近的清单工作,混凝土联盟的先前工作以及旧金山建筑物的改造经验,可以在旧金山清单中识别出1980年前的几种常见混凝土建筑物类型。本文试图回答以下几个问题:1.某些类型的旧金山混凝土建筑有多脆弱? 2.在评估漏洞时,如何比较不同的评估方法? 3.在确定是否应进行详细的建筑评估时,一种评估方法是否更加经济或有效? 4.整个1980年前的旧金山混凝土建筑存货的潜在脆弱性是什么? 5.如果一项潜在法规针对特定漏洞(例如,软故事)或将解决一个漏洞,则将问题转移到建筑物的另一部分(例如,第二层列)。为了回答这些问题,SEAONC EBC的NDC小组委员会使用了一系列分析方法,对在某些时代建造的典型混凝土建筑物进行了分析,包括:Hassan&Sozen优先指数,ATC-14,ASCE 41(方法1,方法2和方法2)。 3),在地震性能预测程序(SP3)中实施的FEMA-154,ATC-78和FEMA P-58。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号