首页> 外文会议>International workshop on statistical atlases and computational models of the heart;International conference on medical imaging computing for computer assisted intervention >Best (and Worst) Practices for Organizing a Challenge on Cardiac Biophysical Models During AI Summer: The CRT-EPiggyl9 Challenge
【24h】

Best (and Worst) Practices for Organizing a Challenge on Cardiac Biophysical Models During AI Summer: The CRT-EPiggyl9 Challenge

机译:在AI夏季组织关于心脏生物物理模型挑战的最佳(和最坏)实践:CRT-EPiggyl9挑战

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

During the last years tens of challenges have been organized to benchmark computational techniques with shared data. Historically, most challenges in conferences such as MICCAI have been devoted to medical image processing, especially on object recognition or segmentation tasks. Due to the increasing popularity and easy access to machine (deep) learning methods, as part of our current Artificial Intellingence (AI) summer, the number of Al-related challenges has exploded. In parallel, the community of biophysical models also has a valuable history of organizing challenges, including synthetic and experimental data, to assess the accuracy of the resulting simulations. In this paper, the similarities and differences in computational challenges organized by these communities are reviewed, suggesting best practices and what to avoid when organizing a challenge on biophysical models. Specifically, details will be given about the preparation of the CRT-EPiggy 19 challenge.
机译:在过去的几年中,已经组织了数十项挑战来使用共享数据对计算技术进行基准测试。从历史上看,像MICCAI这样的会议中的大多数挑战都致力于医学图像处理,尤其是在对象识别或分割任务上。由于越来越流行并且易于使用机器(深度)学习方法,因此在我们当前的人工智能(AI)夏季,与铝有关的挑战数量激增。同时,生物物理模型社区在组织挑战(包括合成数据和实验数据)以评估所得模拟的准确性方面也具有宝贵的历史。在本文中,对这些社区组织的计算挑战的异同进行了回顾,提出了最佳实践以及在组织对生物物理模型的挑战时应避免的事情。具体来说,将详细介绍CRT-EPiggy 19挑战赛的准备工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号