首页> 外文会议>Corrosion conference and expo >DNA sequencing of oilfield samples: impact of protocol choices on the microbiological conclusions
【24h】

DNA sequencing of oilfield samples: impact of protocol choices on the microbiological conclusions

机译:油田样品的DNA测序:方案选择对微生物结论的影响

获取原文

摘要

In the last decade, molecular microbiology techniques have significantly expanded the understanding of the resident microflora in hydrocarbon reservoirs and production systems. These methods have been steadily accepted by the industry and are widely viewed as accurate, comprehensive and highly valuable tools that augment or may eventually replace conventional methods. The resulting information has helped operators and service companies to develop better monitoring programs, assess risks and tailor mitigation strategies to control undesired microbial activities in wells, flowlines and separation facilities. Nonetheless, many molecular procedures cannot be performed onsite and samples are typically sent offsite for specialized analyses. The lack of standard procedures hinders comparison of findings between laboratories. Operators currently use dissimilar sampling and preservation protocols, different methods for DNA extraction, separate sequencing platforms and varied approaches for the analyses of the resulting molecular data. In this study, we retrieved multiple samples from several wells in an onshore oilfield and submitted them for 16S rDNA taxonomic analysis in two different laboratories. The results showed significant differences between laboratories in the total abundance of organisms, their taxonomic composition and the presence/absence of certain diagnostic bacteria. Close examination of the protocols revealed that the sample preservation techniques and specific 16S rDNA gene primer sets likely had a significant impact on the resulting information. Collectively, this experience suggests that while molecular techniques are extremely powerful tools to analyze oilfield microbiology, the lack of consensus on an industry wide protocol may lead to discrepancies that could negatively impact the exploitation of these promising methods.
机译:在过去的十年中,分子微生物技术极大地扩展了人们对油气藏和生产系统中微生物群落的认识。这些方法已被业界稳定地接受,并被广泛认为是准确,全面和极有价值的工具,可以补充或最终取代传统方法。由此产生的信息已帮助运营商和服务公司制定更好的监控程序,评估风险并制定缓解策略,以控制井,流水线和分离设施中有害的微生物活动。但是,许多分子程序无法在现场执行,并且样品通常会在现场外发送以进行专门的分析。缺乏标准程序阻碍了实验室之间的发现比较。运营商目前使用不同的采样和保存方案,用于DNA提取的不同方法,单独的测序平台以及用于分析所得分子数据的各种方法。在这项研究中,我们从陆上油田的几口井中提取了多个样品,并将其提交给两个不同实验室中的16S rDNA分类学分析。结果表明,实验室之间在生物体的总丰度,生物分类组成和某些诊断细菌的存在/不存在方面存在显着差异。对方案的仔细检查表明,样品保存技术和特定的16S rDNA基因引物组可能会对所得信息产生重大影响。总的来说,这种经验表明,尽管分子技术是分析油田微生物的极其强大的工具,但对整个行业协议的共识不足可能会导致差异,从而可能会对这些有前途的方法的开发产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号