首页> 外文会议>International conference on human-computer interaction;International conference on engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics >Comparison of Intellectus Statistics and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences: Differences in User Performance Based on Presentation of Statistical Data
【24h】

Comparison of Intellectus Statistics and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences: Differences in User Performance Based on Presentation of Statistical Data

机译:智力统计和社会科学统计软件包的比较:基于统计数据表示的用户表现差异

获取原文

摘要

Data-to-text systems create reports using natural language to simplify the presentation of complex data. Intellectus Statistics (IS) is a cloud-based statistical analysis software that provides users with output displayed in American Psychological Association (APA) narrative format. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) is another statistical analysis software; however, SPSS output is mainly presented numerically with tables and graphs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of using IS and SPSS to conduct and interpret analyses. An output presented in narrative format could be beneficial to students learning statistics who may have difficulty interpreting results. Overall, accuracy scores and time on task for the two software were not significantly different. Perceived usability and ease of use ratings for IS were significantly higher compared to SPSS. On the other hand, ratings of perceived usefulness were not significantly different between the two software. Results also suggested that participants preferred IS and felt more confident in conducting statistical analyses when using the software. Though there was no significant difference in task accuracy between the two software, data-to-text output helped students with interpreting assumptions for analyses and formatting written results.
机译:数据到文本系统使用自然语言创建报告,以简化复杂数据的表示。 Intellectus Statistics(IS)是基于云的统计分析软件,可为用户提供以美国心理学会(APA)叙述格式显示的输出。社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)是另一种统计分析软件。但是,SPSS输出主要通过表格和图表以数字形式显示。这项研究的目的是比较使用IS和SPSS进行和解释分析的有效性和效率。以叙述形式呈现的输出可能会有益于学生学习可能难以解释结果的统计数据。总体而言,两个软件的准确性得分和完成任务的时间没有显着差异。与SPSS相比,IS的感知可用性和易用性等级显着更高。另一方面,两个软件之间的感知有用性评级没有显着差异。结果还表明,参与者更喜欢IS,并且在使用该软件时对进行统计分析更有信心。尽管两种软件的任务准确性没有显着差异,但数据到文本的输出可以帮助学生解释分析的假设并格式化书面结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号