【24h】

Go/No Go Criteria in Formative E-Rubrics

机译:形成性电子规则中的通过/不通过标准

获取原文

摘要

Learning processes rely on the progressive assimilation and objective assessment of concepts. In this regard, learning rubrics are commonplace. However, the design of these rubrics has focused mainly on scoring (summative rubrics), whereas formative rubrics have received significantly less attention. Electronic formats (e-rubrics) enable dynamic and interactive functionalities that facilitate the adaptable and adaptive delivery of content. In this paper, we examine three characteristics to make formative rubrics more adaptable and adaptive: criteria dichotomization, weighted evaluation criteria, and goo-go criteria. A new approach to the design of formative rubrics is introduced, where dichotomization and weighted criteria are combined with the use of goo-go criteria. The approach is discussed as a method to better guide the learner while adjusting to the student's assimilation pace. Two types of goo-go criteria (hard and soft) are studied and experimentally validated in a Computer-Aided Design assessment context.
机译:学习过程依赖于对概念的逐步吸收和客观评估。在这方面,学习专栏很普遍。但是,这些专栏的设计主要集中在计分(累加专栏)上,而形成性专栏的关注则少得多。电子格式(电子专栏)实现了动态和交互功能,有助于适应性和自适应性地传递内容。在本文中,我们研究了三个特征,以使形成性规则更加适应和适应:标准二分法,加权评估标准和通过/不通过标准。引入了一种新的格式规则设计方法,该方法将二分法和加权标准与通过/不通过标准结合使用。讨论该方法是在适应学生同化步伐的同时更好地指导学习者的一种方法。在计算机辅助设计评估环境中研究了两种通过/不通过标准(硬性和软性),并通过实验进行了验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号