首页> 外文会议>Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology >Does My Organization Need an Innovation Management Function?: Towards a Model for Evaluation
【24h】

Does My Organization Need an Innovation Management Function?: Towards a Model for Evaluation

机译:我的组织需要创新管理功能吗?:建立评估模型

获取原文

摘要

Many innovation management experts, especially those from academic institutions and management consulting firms, believe that innovation is a discipline in its own right (or developing towards one). From this point of view, it can be concluded that the management of innovation activities in organizations will be performed by a separate function within the structure of the organization. There are many examples of companies that manage innovation as a corporate function, headed by a VP Innovation, Chief Technology and Innovation Officer or the like. To the contrary, other companies that also underpin the key role of innovation, do not believe in functional structuring of the management of innovation. Their approach relies heavily on the innovative culture and open, unstructured interaction and idea sharing through all levels of the organization. Google is a good example that supports this approach. This paper aims to share insight into this contradictory issue. A literature based research approach is followed to identify possible factors that can help firms to characterize themselves. The common view is that innovation management consist out of dimensions like innovative leadership, innovation culture, the innovation process, knowledge management and others. This point of view supports the need to drive innovation with an integrative approach mainly by active management of innovation through a formal structure within the organization. Nevertheless, various points of view for, or against a formal structure are argued in terms of the contexts related to these dimensions. Conclusions are drawn, and a taxonomy suggested for the development of a model for firms to guide themselves when determining their need for an innovation management function and what the management priorities should be.
机译:许多创新管理专家,特别是来自学术机构和管理咨询公司的创新管理专家,都认为创新本身就是一门学科(或向一门学科发展)。从这个角度来看,可以得出结论,组织中创新活动的管理将由组织结构内的单独职能来执行。有许多将创新作为公司职能进行管理的公司的示例,这些创新由创新副总裁,首席技术和创新官等领导。相反,其他也支持创新的关键作用的公司则不相信创新管理的功能结构。他们的方法在很大程度上依赖于创新文化以及组织各个层面的开放,非结构化的互动和思想共享。 Google是支持这种方法的一个很好的例子。本文旨在分享对此矛盾问题的见解。遵循基于文献的研究方法来确定可能有助于企业形象化的因素。普遍的观点是,创新管理包括诸如创新领导力,创新文化,创新过程,知识管理等维度。这种观点支持需要采用集成方法来推动创新的方法,该方法主要是通过组织内部的正式结构对创新进行积极的管理。然而,根据与这些维度有关的上下文,争论了赞成或反对形式结构的各种观点。得出结论,并提出了分类法,以供企业确定自己对创新管理职能的需求以及管理优先级应如何确定时对其进行自我指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号