首页> 外文会议>Pipelines conference >Preparing for the Worst, Expecting the Best: Removing the Guessing from Pipeline Contingency Planning and Response Strategies
【24h】

Preparing for the Worst, Expecting the Best: Removing the Guessing from Pipeline Contingency Planning and Response Strategies

机译:为最坏的期望做好准备:消除对管线应急计划和响应策略的猜测

获取原文

摘要

Emergency Response and Contingency Planning documents are becoming a recognized part of well-run utilities, especially for water and wastewater buried and aging infrastructure. Though well-intentioned, many of these plans lack unified standards, an understanding of their usefulness and integration with other plans, or are not capable of fulfilling their intent during execution. Several documented guidance strategies exist within the water/wastewater industry and from incident response agencies, such as FEMA. This paper overviews the following: 1. Criteria for identifying infrastructure in need of a plan; 2. Recommended planning strategies; 3. Gap analysis metrics to identify common short-comings of existing emergency plans; 4. A strawman outline of a plan that satisfies emergency planning goals that can be further tested.
机译:应急响应和应急计划文件正成为运行良好的公用事业的公认组成部分,尤其是对于水和废水掩埋和老化的基础设施而言。尽管有很好的意图,但其中许多计划缺乏统一的标准,缺乏对它们的实用性和与其他计划的集成的理解,或者在执行过程中无法实现其意图。在水/废水行业以及事件响应机构(例如FEMA)中存在几种已记录的指导策略。本文概述了以下内容:1.确定需要计划的基础架构的标准; 2.建议的规划策略; 3.差距分析指标,以确定现有应急计划的共同缺点; 4.满足紧急计划目标的计划草稿,可以进一步进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号