首页> 外文会议>Pipelines conference >Comparison of Carbon Footprint of Trenchless and Open-Cut Methods for Underground Freight Transportation
【24h】

Comparison of Carbon Footprint of Trenchless and Open-Cut Methods for Underground Freight Transportation

机译:地下货运的无沟渠和明挖方式碳足迹比较

获取原文

摘要

Carbon dioxide (CO_2) is the primary greenhouse gas emitted through human activities. The construction industry is a major producer of such emission due in part to the magnitude of operations and the vast array of equipment. The proposed underground freight transportation (UFT) uses unmanned vehicles to move freight through tunnels and pipelines between terminals. This paper presents a comparison of carbon footprint for conventional open-cut and trenchless technology methods, particularly tunneling in rural area. The paper considers building a freight pipeline in a proposed route from Huntsville to Madisonville, Texas, under existing right-of-way and with a pipe diameter of 8 to 13 ft. The objective of this paper is to quantify carbon emissions produced by construction equipment for hauling excavated soils during pipeline construction. Trenchless technologies with minimum surface and subsurface disruptions offer a viable alternative and result in lesser carbon emissions compared to open-cut method. The findings of this paper will assist the pipeline construction industry in technology selection to minimize environmental impacts.
机译:二氧化碳(CO_2)是人类活动所排放的主要温室气体。建筑行业是此类排放的主要生产者,部分原因是运营规模和设备种类繁多。拟议的地下货物运输(UFT)使用无人驾驶车辆通过码头之间的隧道和管道运输货物。本文比较了传统的露天开采和非开挖技术方法的碳足迹,特别是在农村地区的隧道掘进。本文考虑在现有的通行权下,从亨茨维尔到得克萨斯州麦迪逊维尔的一条拟议路线中建立一条货运管道,管道直径为8到13英尺。本文的目的是量化建筑设备产生的碳排放量用于在管道施工中拖运挖掘的土壤。与露天开采方法相比,具有最小的表面和地下破坏程度的无沟槽技术提供了可行的替代方案,并减少了碳排放量。本文的研究结果将有助于管道建设行业进行技术选择,以最大程度地减少对环境的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号