首页> 外文会议>Corrosion conference and expo >HOW MANY EXCAVATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE ABSENCE OF SCC ON A PIPELINE?
【24h】

HOW MANY EXCAVATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE ABSENCE OF SCC ON A PIPELINE?

机译:需要多少次挖掘才能确认管线上没有SCC?

获取原文

摘要

NACE Standard Practice SP0204, Stress Corrosion Cracking Direct Assessment Methodology (SCCDA), is used by pipeline operators to infer the presence or absence of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) on a pipeline. Results from direct examinations of the pipeline are easy to interpret when SCC is found. It is more complicated when SCC is not found. How many digs are required to confirm that a pipeline has a low probability of SCC? This paper examines the relationship between SCC threat modeling and the number of digs required to conclude that a pipeline is SCC free. Results show that when a reliable inspection prioritization model is used, few digs are required to infer that a pipe has a low probability of SCC. On the other hand, when the SCC model used to select dig locations does not take into account the relevant factor leading to SCC and their interactions, the number of direct inspection required can be high. Consequently the cost of the SCCDA process is directly linked to the quality of the SCC model used to choose direct inspection locations.
机译:NACE标准实践SP0204,应力腐蚀开裂直接评估方法(SCCDA),被管道运营商用来推断管道上是否存在应力腐蚀开裂(SCC)。找到SCC时,直接检查管道的结果很容易解释。如果找不到SCC,情况会更加复杂。需要多少挖掘才能确认管道发生SCC的可能性低?本文研究了SCC威胁建模与得出管道无SCC所需的挖掘次数之间的关系。结果表明,当使用可靠的检查优先级模型时,几乎不需要挖掘就能推断出管道发生SCC的可能性低。另一方面,当用于选择挖掘位置的SCC模型未考虑导致SCC及其相互作用的相关因素时,所需的直接检查次数可能会很高。因此,SCCDA过程的成本与用于选择直接检查位置的SCC模型的质量直接相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号