首页> 外文会议>International ocean and polar engineering conference;International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers >Compressive and Uplift Static Load Tests of Shaft and Base Grouted Concrete Bored Piles
【24h】

Compressive and Uplift Static Load Tests of Shaft and Base Grouted Concrete Bored Piles

机译:钻孔灌注桩的竖向与静压试验研究。

获取原文

摘要

This paper provides an investigation of shaft and base grouted concretepile behavior by conducting vertical compressive and uplift static loadtests (SLTs) in Jinan, China. Three concrete piles were tested bycompressive SLTs. Two of these piles were applied with shaft and basegrouting, and base grouting technology respectively, and the third wasapplied without any grouting. Two uplift SLTs were carried out on oneshaft and base grouted pile, and one pile without grouting. Traditionalmethods which include Load-settlement curvatures (L-s), Settlementlogtime curvatures (s-lgt) and Time-log Load curvatures (t-lgQ)analysis were provided to check if the bored piles reached the designrequirement. In addition, an interpretation of the test results fromDouble-tangent, DeBeer’s, and Chin’s methods (for compressive SLTs)and Mazurkiewicz’s method (for uplift SLTs) were provided fordetermining the ultimate pile capacity where piles experienced nonplungingfailure. Results from the five SLTs program indicates that theDouble-tangent and DeBeer's test results are close to each otherwhereas Chin's method overestimates the pile capacity; the base andshaft grouting pile and base grouting pile (compressive load) increases9.82% and 2.89% of its capacity, respectively. Compared to theultimate uplift SLTs, there is a 15.7% increment of pile capacity afterusing base and shaft grouting technology.
机译:本文对竖井和基础灌浆混凝土进行了研究 进行竖向压缩和竖向静载荷的桩特性 中国济南的测试(SLT)。通过三个混凝土桩进行了测试 压缩SLT。这些桩中的两桩分别采用了竖井和底井 灌浆和基础灌浆技术,第三种是 无需任何灌浆即可施工。在一个平台上进行了两次提升SLT 井筒和基础灌浆桩,一堆不灌浆。传统的 包括载荷沉降曲率(L-s),沉降日志的方法 时间曲率(s-lgt)和时间对数负载曲率(t-lgQ) 提供分析以检查钻孔桩是否达到设计 要求。此外,对测试结果的解释来自 双正切,DeBeer和Chin的方法(用于压缩SLT) 并提供了Mazurkiewicz的方法(用于提升SLT) 确定桩身不跌落的最终桩身容量 失败。五个SLT计划的结果表明, 双切线和DeBeer的测试结果彼此接近 Chin的方法高估了桩的承载能力。基地和 竖井注浆桩和基础注浆桩(压缩载荷)增加 其容量分别为9.82%和2.89%。相比 极限升力SLT,之后桩容量增加15.7% 采用基础和竖井灌浆技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号