首页> 外文会议>International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis >PRA PEER REVIEW FINDING CLOSURE VIA INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT
【24h】

PRA PEER REVIEW FINDING CLOSURE VIA INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT

机译:PRA同行评审通过独立评估发现闭幕

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A process has been developed for performing a focused scope independent assessment to review close out of "Finding" level Facts and Observations (F&Os) of record from prior Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) peer reviews against the ASME/ANS Standard.' The results of this independent assessment will be used to support future License Amendment Request (LAR) submittals. F&O dispositions reviewed and determined to have been adequately addressed through this technical review process will be considered as "closed" and no longer relevant to the current PRA model, and thus need not be carried forward nor discussed in future LAR submittals. The process generally follows the applicable guidance defined in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 05-04, Rev.3 (Process for Performing Internal Events PRA Peer Reviews Using the ASME/ANS PRA Standard); NEI 07-12, Rev 1 (Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment (FPRA) Peer Review Process Guidelines); and NEI 12-13 Rev.O (External Hazards PRA Peer Review Process Guidelines). Although those processes were developed for use in performing peer reviews of Technical Elements of the PRA, rather than performing reviews of the resolution of prior peer review finding level F&Os, the NEI documents provide a solid foundation for performing these independent assessments. Performance of independent assessments of F&O resolutions via this process is encouraged by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The results of this process should obviate the need for NRC review of PRAs allowing the NRC review of LARs to focus on application specific impacts, key assumptions, and areas identified by the peer review as being of concern. The process has been applied to several plant independent assessment finding closure reviews to date with several more planned for the near term. Insights from the technical reviews conducted on Exelon plants as of this writing (Limerick, Peach Bottom, Braidwood, Byron) are summarized in this paper.
机译:已经开发了一种用于进行集中范围独立评估的过程,以根据ASME / ANS标准对先前概率风险评估(PRA)同行评审中记录的“发现”级事实和观察(F&O)进行回顾。此独立评估的结果将用于支持将来的许可证修订请求(LAR)提交。经过审查并确定已通过此技术审查过程充分解决的F&O处置将被视为“封闭”且不再与当前PRA模型相关,因此无需在以后的LAR提交中继续进行或讨论。该过程通常遵循核能研究所(NEI)05-04,修订版3(使用ASME / ANS PRA标准执行内部事件PRA同行评审的过程)中定义的适用指南; NEI 07-12,修订版1(火灾概率风险评估(FPRA)对等审查流程指南);和NEI 12-13 Rev.O(外部危害PRA对等审查流程指南)。尽管这些流程是为执行PRA技术要素的同行评审而开发的,而不是对先前的同行评审找到F&O级别的决议进行评审,但NEI文件为进行这些独立的评估提供了坚实的基础。核监管委员会(NRC)鼓励通过此过程对F&O决议进行独立评估。此过程的结果应避免对PRA进行NRC审查的必要性,从而使LAR的NRC审查可以集中于应用程序的特定影响,关键假设以及同行评审认为值得关注的领域。迄今为止,该流程已应用于几家工厂独立评估中,以查找关闭评估,并计划在近期内进行更多评估。本文总结了在撰写本文时对Exelon工厂进行的技术审查(Limerick,Peach Bottom,Braidwood,Byron)的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号