首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services >Control and optimization of quality cost based on discrete grey forecasting model
【24h】

Control and optimization of quality cost based on discrete grey forecasting model

机译:基于离散灰色预测模型的质量成本控制与优化

获取原文

摘要

With the deepening and evolution of quality concept, the economy of quality is becoming more and more important, and the analysis of economy of quality is becoming an important part of quality management. The purpose of carrying out quality management is to seek a balance between quality level, quality cost and economic benefits. Since 1930s, quality management has gone through quality inspection phase, statistical quality control phase, total quality management phase and supply chain quality management phase. The theoretical system has gradually matured. In Juran's quality cost characteristic curve, the horizontal axis represents quality level while the vertical axis represents quality cost, and the total mass quality cost is composed of costs of conformance and costs of non-conformance. When the curve of costs of conformance and curve of costs of non-conformance intersects, the total mass quality cost reaches its minimum, which is called the best quality cost. On the basis of Juran's quality cost characteristic curve, many scholars put forward a series of control and optimization models of quality cost, which can be divided into four categories: (1) Prediction of quality cost based on the optimal exponential function model. The optimal exponential function model regards costs of conformance as positive exponential function and costs of non-conformance as negative exponential function. The total mass quality cost is the sum of positive exponential function and negative exponential function. Through the derivation of total mass quality cost, we can get the best quality level and then get the best quality cost. (2) The best quality cost model based on Taguchi's loss function. In this quality cost prediction model, costs of conformance include prevention cost and appraisal cost. Both prevention cost and appraisal cost can be expressed by Cobb-Douglas production function. Costs of non-conformance can be expanded according to Taylor formula and high-order infinitesimal items can be omitted. Then we can get the total mass quality cost. In this model, the point of best quality level is not just at the intersection of costs of conformance and costs of non-conformance. (3) Prediction of quality cost based on K.K. Govil function. In this model, we use K.K. Govil function which contains four parameters to simulate costs of conformance and costs of non-conformance. Like the first situation, the total mass quality cost is the sum of costs of conformance and costs of non-conformance. After the derivation, the best quality level and the best quality cost can be gained. (4) Prediction of quality cost based on Cobb-Douglas production function. Both costs of conformance and costs of non-conformance have a representation according to Cobb-Douglas production function. Then we sum up costs of conformance and costs of non-conformance, and can get the total mass quality cost. Let the derivation of total mass quality cost be zero, we can also get the best quality level and the best quality cost. These four models have been widely used for prediction and optimizations of quality cost, but when face a real situation, we don't have much information and the numbers of data are rather little. As grey system theory is famous of solving problems with “less data” and “poor information”, we try to use discrete grey model (DGM) into the prediction and optimizations of quality cost. Because certain interference exists in raw data, weakening buffer operator are introduced to reduce the environmental interference. In a real case, we compare DGM with traditional optimal exponential function model to simulate quality cost. The sum of squares of residuals and the mean of the relative error show that the prediction accuracy of discrete grey model after operated by first order weakening buffer operator is improved obviously. If we mix DGM and traditional optimal exponential function model together, we'll get a better result. With the rise of various quality ideas such as total quality management (TPM) and zero defect management, the requirement of quality cost is getting higher and higher. What's more, traditional static model may no longer apply. At this time, we should use new theory to guide the quality cost management of enterprise.
机译:随着质量观念的深入发展,质量经济越来越重要,对质量经济的分析已成为质量管理的重要组成部分。进行质量管理的目的是在质量水平,质量成本和经济效益之间寻求平衡。自1930年代以来,质量管理已经历了质量检查阶段,统计质量控制阶段,全面质量管理阶段和供应链质量管理阶段。理论体系逐渐成熟。在Juran的质量成本特征曲线中,水平轴代表质量水平,垂直轴代表质量成本,总质量质量成本由合格成本和不合格成本组成。当合格成本曲线与不合格成本曲线相交时,总质量成本达到其最小值,称为最佳质量成本。基于Juran的质量成本特征曲线,许多学者提出了一系列的质量成本控制和优化模型,可以分为四类:(1)基于最优指数函​​数模型的质量成本预测。最优指数函​​数模型将一致性成本视为正指数函数,将不一致性成本视为负指数函数。质量总成本成本是正指数函数和负指数函数的总和。通过推导总质量成本成本,我们可以获得最佳质量水平,然后获得最佳质量成本。 (2)基于田口损失函数的最佳质量成本模型。在此质量成本预测模型中,一致性成本包括预防成本和评估成本。预防成本和评估成本都可以用Cobb-Douglas生产函数表示。可以根据泰勒公式扩大不符合项的成本,可以省略高阶无穷小项。然后,我们可以获得总质量质量成本。在此模型中,最佳质量水平的点不只是合格成本和不合格成本的交集。 (3)基于K.K.的质量成本预测Govil功能。在此模型中,我们使用K.K. Govil函数包含四个参数,用于模拟符合性成本和不符合性成本。与第一种情况一样,总质量成本成本是合格成本和不合格成本之和。推导之后,可以获得最佳质量水平和最佳质量成本。 (4)基于Cobb-Douglas生产函数的质量成本预测。一致性成本和不一致性成本都具有根据Cobb-Douglas生产函数的表示形式。然后,我们将合规成本和不合规成本相加,可以得到总质量成本。令总质量质量成本的推导为零,我们也可以获得最佳质量水平和最佳质量成本。这四个模型已被广泛用于质量成本的预测和优化,但是当面对实际情况时,我们没有太多信息,数据量也很少。由于灰色系统理论以解决“数据少”和“信息差”的问题而闻名,因此我们尝试将离散灰色模型(DGM)用于质量成本的预测和优化。由于原始数据中存在某些干扰,因此引入了弱化缓冲运算符以减少环境干扰。在实际情况下,我们将DGM与传统的最佳指数函数模型进行比较以模拟质量成本。残差平方和与相对误差的均值表明,经一阶弱化缓冲算子运算后的离散灰色模型的预测精度明显提高。如果将DGM和传统的最佳指数函数模型混合在一起,将会得到更好的结果。随着全面质量管理(TPM)和零缺陷管理等各种质量观念的兴起,对质量成本的要求越来越高。而且,传统的静态模型可能不再适用。这时,我们应该用新的理论来指导企业的质量成本管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号