首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference;International Association for Energy Economics >CHOOSING THE GREEN ENERGY OPTION: Willingness to Pay of Metro Manila Residents for Solar Energy
【24h】

CHOOSING THE GREEN ENERGY OPTION: Willingness to Pay of Metro Manila Residents for Solar Energy

机译:选择绿色能源选择:愿意为马尼拉大都会居民支付太阳能

获取原文

摘要

The energy market in the Philippines remains to have one of the highest electricity rates inthe region averaging at US$0.15/kWh (PHP 7.5/kWh), excluding VAT, as opposed to the overallenergy market average of US$0.13/kWh (PHP 6.5/kWh). The movement towards renewable energy,specifically solar energy, will pose as an expensive one with the country’s energy sector providingFeed-in-Tariff rates as high as US$0.17/kWh (PHP 8.69/kWh) for solar energy power plants.Increasing the share of renewables at the current state of the energy regulatory background wouldyield a three-fold increase in residential electricity bills. The issue lies in the uniform charge thatconsumers bear regardless of where the electricity is sourced resulting in rates that only considercosts and not the consumers. But if they are given the option to choose where their electricity comesfrom, a number of consumers may potentially choose economically costlier sources of electricitydue to higher levels of utility coupled with the willingness to pay of consuming environmentallyfriendlysourced electricity. A contingent valuation survey was conducted to determine theirwillingness-to-pay for solar energy on a sample that was representative of Metro Manila to elicittheir willingness-to-pay and a Single Bounded Dichotomous Choice and Double BoundedDichotomous Choice analysis was used to estimate the amount they were willing to pay. The resultsshowed that Metro Manila residents are willing to pay a premium on top of their current electricitybill amounting to US$5.37 (PHP268.42) – US$8.71 (PHP435.37) per month, which is approximately0.80% - 1.29% of their monthly household income. It was also discovered that besides higherincome of households, a higher level of self-perceived knowledge on environmental awarenesssignificantly affected the likelihood of a consumer to pay the premium. Shifting towards renewableenergy is an expensive move not only for the government because of high capital investment butalso to consumers; however, the Green Energy Option—a policy mechanism which gives consumersthe option to decide where their electricity comes from—can potentially balance the shift of theeconomic burden by transitioning from a uniformly charged electricity rate to equitably chargingconsumers based on their willingness to pay for renewably sourced energy.
机译:菲律宾的能源市场仍然是电价最高的国家之一 该地区的平均价格为0.15美元/千瓦时(7.5菲律宾比索/千瓦时),不包括增值税, 能源市场平均价格为$ 0.13 / kWh(PHP 6.5 / kWh)。向可再生能源的运动, 特别是太阳能,该国的能源部门将提供昂贵的能源, 太阳能发电厂的上网电价高达0.17美元/千瓦时(8.69菲律宾比索/千瓦时)。 在当前的能源监管背景下,增加可再生能源的份额将 会使居民的电费增加三倍。问题在于统一收费 消费者承担费用,而不管电力来自何处,导致费率仅考虑 成本,而不是消费者。但是如果他们可以选择电力的来源 许多消费者可能会从中选择经济上成本更高的电力来源 由于更高的效用水平,以及愿意支付环保消费的意愿 采购电力。进行了或有估值评估,以确定他们的 愿意以马尼拉大都会的代表性样品支付太阳能的意愿 他们的支付意愿和单界二分法选择和双界 二分法选择分析用于估计他们愿意支付的金额。结果 表明马尼拉大都会居民愿意为他们目前的电费支付额外费用 账单,金额为每月5.37美元(PHP268.42)–每月8.71美元(PHP435.37),大约是 占月家庭收入的0.80%-1.29%。还发现除了更高 家庭收入,对环境意识的自我认知水平更高 大大影响了消费者支付保费的可能性。转向可再生能源 能源是一项昂贵的举动,不仅因为政府投入大量资金,而且对于政府 也给消费者;但是,绿色能源方案是一种政策机制,可以为消费者提供 决定电力来源的选项-可能会平衡 从统一充电电价过渡到公平充电的经济负担 消费者基于他们愿意为可再生能源付费的意愿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号