首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference;International Association for Energy Economics >GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION: STRATEGIC INTERACTIONS OR UNILATERAL GAINS?
【24h】

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION: STRATEGIC INTERACTIONS OR UNILATERAL GAINS?

机译:缓解全球气候变化:战略互动还是单边收益?

获取原文

摘要

1.USA is a net gainer in net present value terms from unilateral implementation;2.The comparative net benefits to Europe and China are negative but small, making their choice sensitive to the discount rate and temperature scenario;3.The dominant strategy for all other countries is to free ride;4.Taking the three large economies as a group, there are net gains from abatement that would be bolstered by universal adoption;5.Yet compensatory side payments are still not affordable. The net gains to all regions do not begin to appear for two decades, rendering commitment to abatement politically difficult.
机译:1.从单方面实施的净现值来看,美国是净收益国; 2,对欧洲和中国的比较净收益为负但很小,这使得它们的选择对折现率和温度情景敏感; 3,其他所有国家的主要战略是搭便车; 4,将三个大经济体作为一个整体来看,减排将产生净收益,这将被普遍采用而加强; 5.然而,补偿性的边际支付仍然无法负担。二十年来,所有地区的净收益都没有开始出现,这在政治上致力实现减排目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号