首页> 外文会议>International congress on advances in nuclear power plants >COMPARISON OF THE POINT-KINETICS AND QUASI-STATIC METHODS WITH SIMMER-Ⅲ- APPLICATION TO A ULOF CALCULATION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THE POINT-KINETICS AND QUASI-STATIC METHODS WITH SIMMER-Ⅲ- APPLICATION TO A ULOF CALCULATION

机译:点动力学和准静态方法与SIMMER-Ⅲ的比较-在ULOF计算中的应用

获取原文

摘要

The neutron kinetics methods used for the calculation of severe accidents of sodium-cooled fast reactors usually differ depending on the phase of the accident. During the primary phase, when the core degradation is limited to the sub-assembly, the point-kinetics model is mostly used. During the secondary phase, as there can be movement of materials in the core, the more precise quasi-static method is generally used. Compared, to quasi-static model, the point-kinetics approach has the important advantage of having a low computational cost. However, it relies on the strong assumption that the flux shape does not change during the transient. This creates discrepancies in the reactivity calculation, and thus in the evolution of the core power, but up to now, point-kinetics has often been used, despite the lack of quantification of these approximations. The goal of this paper is to give an estimation of the error performed when using point-kinetics in spite of the quasi-static method. The SIMMER-Ⅲ code, which features quasi-static kinetics, is used to make this evaluation. To make a correct comparison between both kinetic approaches, an adaptation of a quasi-static model for simulating a point-kinetics calculation scheme has been done with the SIMMER code. This enables to compare the two kinetics approaches without introducing any additional bias in the thermohydraulics or structural mechanics models during the transient. This comparison was performed in the framework of the ASTRID development on an Unprotected Loss Of Flow accident (ULOF) of a sodium-cooled fast reactor. As expected, the results show a good agreement at the beginning of the transient, up to the sodium boiling. Afterwards, an important change in the flux shape occurs, which cannot be taken into account by point-kinetics and leads to rather important discrepancies. Consequently, the results show that point-kinetics is irrelevant once the sodium boiling has begun. Nowadays, as the computational capacities have increased, quasi-static kinetics must be privileged.
机译:用于计算钠冷快堆严重事故的中子动力学方法通常根据事故的阶段而有所不同。在初级阶段,当核心退化仅限于子组件时,通常使用点动力学模型。在第二阶段,由于核心中可能会有材料移动,因此通常使用更精确的准静态方法。与准静态模型相比,点动力学方法具有计算成本低的重要优势。但是,它基于强大的假设,即瞬变期间通量形状不会改变。这会在反应性计算中产生差异,从而在核心力量的演变中也会产生差异,但是到目前为止,尽管缺乏这些近似值的量化,但仍经常使用点动力学。本文的目的是尽管使用准静态方法,但仍要估计使用点动力学时所执行的误差。使用具有准静态动力学特性的SIMMER-Ⅲ代码进行此评估。为了在两种动力学方法之间进行正确的比较,已经使用SIMMER代码对准静态模型进行了仿真,以模拟点动力学计算方案。这使得能够比较两种动力学方法,而在瞬态过程中不会在热工液压或结构力学模型中引入任何额外的偏差。这项比较是在ASTRID研发的框架下,对钠冷快堆的无保护流量损失事故(ULOF)进行的。如预期的那样,结果表明在过渡开始时直至钠沸腾为止都具有良好的一致性。此后,通量形状发生重要变化,点动力学无法将其考虑在内,并导致相当大的差异。因此,结果表明,一旦钠沸腾开始,点动力学就无关紧要了。如今,随着计算能力的提高,必须优先考虑准静态动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号