首页> 外文会议>International congress on advances in nuclear power plants >COMPARISON OF THE POINT-KINETICS AND QUASI-STATIC METHODS WITH SIMMER-Ⅲ- APPLICATION TO A ULOF CALCULATION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THE POINT-KINETICS AND QUASI-STATIC METHODS WITH SIMMER-Ⅲ- APPLICATION TO A ULOF CALCULATION

机译:用Simmer-Ⅲ-应用于ULOF计算的点动力学和准静态方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

The neutron kinetics methods used for the calculation of severe accidents of sodium-cooled fast reactors usually differ depending on the phase of the accident. During the primary phase, when the core degradation is limited to the sub-assembly, the point-kinetics model is mostly used. During the secondary phase, as there can be movement of materials in the core, the more precise quasi-static method is generally used. Compared, to quasi-static model, the point-kinetics approach has the important advantage of having a low computational cost. However, it relies on the strong assumption that the flux shape does not change during the transient. This creates discrepancies in the reactivity calculation, and thus in the evolution of the core power, but up to now, point-kinetics has often been used, despite the lack of quantification of these approximations. The goal of this paper is to give an estimation of the error performed when using point-kinetics in spite of the quasi-static method. The SIMMER-Ⅲ code, which features quasi-static kinetics, is used to make this evaluation. To make a correct comparison between both kinetic approaches, an adaptation of a quasi-static model for simulating a point-kinetics calculation scheme has been done with the SIMMER code. This enables to compare the two kinetics approaches without introducing any additional bias in the thermohydraulics or structural mechanics models during the transient. This comparison was performed in the framework of the ASTRID development on an Unprotected Loss Of Flow accident (ULOF) of a sodium-cooled fast reactor. As expected, the results show a good agreement at the beginning of the transient, up to the sodium boiling. Afterwards, an important change in the flux shape occurs, which cannot be taken into account by point-kinetics and leads to rather important discrepancies. Consequently, the results show that point-kinetics is irrelevant once the sodium boiling has begun. Nowadays, as the computational capacities have increased, quasi-static kinetics must be privileged.
机译:用于计算钠冷却的快速反应堆严重事故的中子动力学方法通常根据事故的阶段而不同。在初级阶段期间,当核心劣化限于子组件时,主要使用点动态模型。在二级相期间,由于核心中的材料移动,通常使用更精确的准静态方法。与准静态模型相比,点动态方法具有低计算成本的重要优势。然而,它依赖于在瞬态期间磁通形状不会改变的强烈假设。这在反应性计算中产生了差异,因此在核心力量的演变中,但到目前为止,尽管缺乏这些近似度的量化,但是已经使用了Point-Kinetics。本文的目的是估计在使用点动态时执行的误差,尽管是准静态方法。使用准静态动力学的Simmer-Ⅲ代码用于进行此评估。为了在两个动力学方法之间进行正确的比较,已经使用SIMMER代码完成了用于模拟点动态计算方案的准静态模型的调整。这使得能够比较两种动力学方法,而不在瞬态期间在热液柱或结构力学模型中引入任何额外的偏差。在Astrid开发的框架上进行了这种比较,以对钠冷却的快速反应器的无保护的流动事故(ULOF)丧失进行。正如预期的那样,结果在短暂的瞬间开始,达到沸腾的良好一致。之后,发生助焊剂形状的重要变化,通过点动力学不能考虑,并导致相当重要的差异。因此,一旦沸腾已经开始,结果表明点动力学是无关的。如今,随着计算能力增加,必须特权准静态动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号