首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics >Perceived, Projected, and True Investment Expertise: Not All Experts Provide Expert Recommendations
【24h】

Perceived, Projected, and True Investment Expertise: Not All Experts Provide Expert Recommendations

机译:感知,预测和真实的投资专业知识:并非所有专家都提供专家建议

获取原文

摘要

Social networks enable knowledge sharing that inevitably begs the question of expertise analysis. Many online profiles claim expertise, but possessing true expertise is rare. We characterize expertise as projected expertise (claims of a person), perceived expertise (how the crowd perceives the individual) and true expertise (factual). StockTwits, an investor-focused microblogging platform, allows us to study all three aspects simultaneously. We analyze more than 18 million tweets spanning 1700 days. The large time scale allows us to also analyze expertise and its categories as they evolve over time, which is the first study of its kind on StockTwits. We propose a method to capture perceived expertise by how significantly a user's follower network grows and how often the user is brought up in conversations. We also quantify actual, market-based, true expertise based on the user's trade and investment recommendations. Finally we provide an analysis bringing out the differences between how users project themselves, how the crowd perceives them, and how they are actually performing on the market. Our results show that users who project themselves as experts are ones that talk the most and provide the least recommendation-to-tweet ratio (that is, most of their conversations are mundane). The recommendations from users who project novice expertise slightly outperform (≈5%) the overall stock market. On the other hand, the trade recommendations from self-proclaimed experts yield 80% less than those of intermediate traders. Interestingly, users who are perceived as experts by others, as measured by centrality measurements, resulted in net negative returns after a four year trading period. Our study also looks at the evolution of expertise, and begins to understand why and what makes users change the way they project their own expertise. For this topic, however, this paper introduces more questions than it answers, which will serve as the basis for future studies.
机译:社交网络使知识共享不可避免地会引起专业知识分析的问题。许多在线个人资料都声称具有专业知识,但很少有真正的专业知识。我们将专业知识描述为预计的专业知识(声称某人),感知的专业知识(人群对个人的看法)和真正的专业知识(事实)。 StockTwits是一个以投资者为中心的微博平台,它使我们能够同时研究所有三个方面。我们分析了跨越1700天的1800万条推文。较长的时间规模使我们还可以分析专业知识及其随时间变化的类别,这是对StockTwits的同类研究中的第一项。我们提出一种方法来捕获感知到的专业知识,方法是根据用户的关注者网络的增长显着程度以及在对话中吸引用户的频率。我们还将根据用户的贸易和投资建议量化基于市场的实际专业知识。最后,我们提供了一个分析,揭示了用户如何进行自我投影,人群如何看待他们以及他们在市场上的实际表现之间的差异。我们的结果表明,将自己投射为专家的用户是交谈最多,推荐/推文比率最低的用户(也就是说,大多数对话是平凡的)。来自预测新手专业知识的用户的建议略胜于整个股票市场(约5%)。另一方面,自称专家的交易建议所产生的收益比中间交易者的收益低80%。有趣的是,通过中心度度量来衡量,被他人视为专家的用户在四年的交易期后产生了净负回报。我们的研究还着眼于专业知识的发展,并开始理解为什么以及为什么使用户改变了他们投射自己的专业知识的方式。但是,对于该主题,本文介绍的问题多于答案,这将为将来的研究奠定基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号