首页> 外文会议>Structural Engineers Association of California convention >Seismic Upgrade of an Existing Tall Building by Different Energy Dissipation Devices
【24h】

Seismic Upgrade of an Existing Tall Building by Different Energy Dissipation Devices

机译:通过不同的耗能设备对既有高层建筑进行抗震升级

获取原文

摘要

The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center has expanded its Tall Building Initiative (TBI) program to include the seismic performance of existing tall buildings. A 35-story steel moment resisting frame, designed in 1968, and had representative details of buildings between 1960 to 1990 was selected for detailed seismic evaluation in the framework of Performance Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE). It was identified that the case study building failed to meet the performance objectives suggested by ASCE 41-13, and had a number of seismic vulnerabilities that endangered its structural integrity at two basic safety earthquake hazard levels (BSE): BSE-1E and BSE-2E. Therefore, exploration of retrofit strategies and their cost-effectiveness are fostered. In this paper, three kinds of supplemental energy dissipation devices are investigated to upgrade the seismic performance of the case study building, including fluid viscous dampers (FVDs), viscous wall dampers (VWDs) and buckling restrained braces (BRBs). The retrofit design started by selecting locations to install supplemental devices. Then the total effective damping ratios needed to achieve the target roof displacements in two directions were estimated based on a damping scale factor (DSF). One retrofit strategy by using FVDs was investigated as a first trail, and the mechanical characteristics of each damper device were calculated based on the overall effective damping ratio and the story wise distributions of dampers. Next, other two retrofit strategies by using VWDs or BRBs were investigated. Sizing of different devices at one location was performed following the principle of equal energy dissipation. The effectiveness of each strategy to meet the retrofit intent of ensuring structural stability at BSE-2E were compared. Moreover, probabilistic damage and loss analysis were conducted using Performance Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT) to relate the structural responses to economic losses. After a detailed examination, it was found that upgrading the case study tall building using FVDs was the most effective retrofit strategy to control structural responses, and reduce damage and economic losses after BSE-2E events.
机译:太平洋地震工程研究(PEER)中心扩大了其高层建筑计划(TBI)计划,以包括现有高层建筑的抗震性能。在基于性能的地震工程(PBEE)框架中,选择了35层钢制抗弯框架,该框架于1968年设计,并具有1960年至1990年之间的建筑物的代表性细节,以进行详细的地震评估。经确定,案例研究大楼未能达到ASCE 41-13提出的性能目标,并且存在许多地震脆弱性,在两个基本安全地震危害等级(BSE):BSE-1E和BSE-B上危及其结构完整性。 2E。因此,促进了对改造策略及其成本效益的探索。本文研究了三种辅助耗能设备,以提高案例研究大楼的抗震性能,包括流体粘性阻尼器(FVD),粘性壁阻尼器(VWD)和屈曲约束支撑(BRB)。改造设计始于选择安装辅助设备的位置。然后,基于阻尼比例因子(DSF)估算实现两个方向上的目标屋顶位移所需的总有效阻尼比。研究了使用FVD的一种改造策略,并将其作为第一步,并基于整体有效阻尼比和阻尼器的故事分布来计算每个阻尼器的机械特性。接下来,研究了其他两种使用VWD或BRB的改装策略。遵循相等的能量耗散原理,在一处对不同设备进行大小调整。比较了每种策略满足BSE-2E确保结构稳定性的改造意图的有效性。此外,使用性能评估计算工具(PACT)进行了概率损坏和损失分析,以将结构响应与经济损失相关联。经过详细检查,发现使用FVD升级案例研究高层建筑是控制结构响应并减少BSE-2E事件后最有效的改造策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号