首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies >Comparison of different surgery operation techniques
【24h】

Comparison of different surgery operation techniques

机译:不同手术方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

This study proceeds from the database of two patient groups. Patients in first group underwent intraabdominal anastomotic operation technique and they come from a selected hospital in USA. Patients in second group underwent extraabdominal anastomotic operation technique and they come from the Clinic of Surgery at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic). Both groups have more than 200 patients. Both operation techniques are compared in the study taking into account the following variables: risk of post-operative morbidity, conversion, operation time, BMI, ASA, etc. Risk of morbidity will be quantified, compared for different patient groups and deeply discussed in the paper, by the use of advanced statistical methods, as logistic regression, Agresti-Coull and Wilson interval, hypotheses testing, etc. To be comparable both data groups had to be adapted and modified at the earliest by the use of a proper method based on propensity score.
机译:这项研究来自两个患者组的数据库。第一组患者接受了腹腔内吻合手术技术,他们来自美国的一家选定医院。第二组患者接受了腹外吻合手术技术,他们来自俄斯特拉发大学医院(捷克共和国)的外科诊所。两组都有200多名患者。在研究中比较了两种手术技术,并考虑了以下变量:术后发病风险,转换,手术时间,BMI,ASA等。对不同患者组的发病风险进行量化,比较,并在研究中进行了深入讨论。通过使用先进的统计方法(如逻辑回归,Agresti-Coull和Wilson区间,假设检验等)进行比较。为了使两个数据组具有可比性,必须尽早使用基于以下方法的适当方法来对这两个数据组进行调整和修改。倾向得分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号