首页> 外文会议>European Wireless Conference >A Comparative Study of Different Relaying Strategies over One-Way Relay Networks
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Different Relaying Strategies over One-Way Relay Networks

机译:单向中继网络上不同中继策略的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

We derive and compare the analytical outage probabilities of conventional decode-and-forward (DF), adaptive DF (ADF), compress-and-forward (CF), and lossy-forward (LF) relaying protocols over fading channels. A joint decoding is assumed at the destination to exploit the source-relay correlation for retrieving the original information of the source. With DF, only if the information sequence can be decoded with an arbitrary low error probability at the relay, it will be forwarded to the destination. With ADF, the source retransmits the information, if a failure of the transmission happens on the source-relay link. With CF, the relay performs the Wyner-Ziv compression and forwards the compressed version to the destination. With LF, the relay node always forwards decoded information sequence to the destination even if a decoding error is detected. The impact of line-of-sight component in the fading variations for transmission chain is taken into account. It is shown that the outage probability with the LF relaying is smaller than that with CF and DF relaying. ADF is superior to LF in terms of outage performance due to the feedback information.
机译:我们推导并比较了衰落信道上常规解码转发(DF),自适应DF(ADF),压缩转发(CF)和有损转发(LF)中继协议的分析中断概率。假定在目的地进行联合解码,以利用源-中继相关性来检索源的原始信息。使用DF,仅当信息序列可以在中继器处以任意低的错误概率被解码时,它才会被转发到目的地。使用ADF,如果在源-中继链路上发生传输失败,则源将重新传输信息。使用CF,中继执行Wyner-Ziv压缩并将压缩后的版本转发到目标。使用LF,即使检测到解码错误,中继节点也始终将解码后的信息序列转发到目的地。考虑了视线成分在传输链衰落变化中的影响。结果表明,LF中继的断电概率小于CF和DF中继的断电概率。由于反馈信息,在断电性能方面,ADF优于LF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号