首页> 外文会议>SAE-China Congress >Rear Seat Belt Usage Models Using FARS and Field Data
【24h】

Rear Seat Belt Usage Models Using FARS and Field Data

机译:使用FARS和现场数据的后座带使用型号

获取原文

摘要

Little research has been performed to evaluate the factors that impact seat belt usage for rear seat occupants. Because of the difficulties to collect rear seat belt data in the field, most researches have to rely on crash data, however, has its limit. Seat belt usage passengers not seriously hurt in a crash would typically not be recorded in the police officer filling report. In this study, Rear seat belt models using logistic regression analysis were performed using both FARS data and observational data. The resulting models were then analyzed to determine differences between using crash data and field data in identifying factors associated with the seat belt usage of rear seat occupants. The research showed both similar and differing results between the models produced using FARS data and field data. All the models using the FARS data showed a strong correlation between the back seat passenger's seat belt usage and the driver's seat belt usage. The research shows there are differences obtained in the factors that influence seat belt usage using field data and FARS data. The research demonstrates that care must be taken in the use of this data with regard to safety research looking at passenger restraint.
机译:已经进行了很少的研究,以评估冲击后座乘员的安全带使用的因素。由于收集了该领域的后座带数据的困难,大多数研究必须依赖崩溃数据,但是,其限制。安全带使用乘客不会严重受伤,通常不会在警察填写报告中记录。在本研究中,使用FARS数据和观察数据进行使用Logistic回归分析的后座椅带模型。然后分析所得到的模型以确定使用碰撞数据和现场数据之间的差异来识别与后座乘员的安全带使用相关的因素。研究显示使用FARS数据和现场数据生产的模型之间的类似和不同的结果。所有使用FARS数据的模型都显示出后座乘客的安全带使用与驾驶员安全带使用之间的强烈相关性。研究表明,在使用现场数据和FARS数据影响安全带使用的因素中存在差异。该研究表明,必须在使用这些数据方面关于看乘客克制的安全研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号