Comparisons of diagnosis in mapping repair systems

摘要

Coherent mappings become very important things in improving the quality of alignments in ontology matching process. Mapping repairs will restore the incoherent condition into the coherent one by removing undesired correspondences. The ability to remove the undesired correspondences as minimal as possible is called minimal diagnosis. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and to compare minimal diagnosis in LogMap Repair, AML Repair, and ALCOMO. The results are comparisons of repair systems and diagnosis techniques. There are two quadrants (of four quadrants) that are matched to the goal of minimal diagnosis, namely quadrant 1 and quadrant 4. The open issues in this field will be exploring the characteristic of four quadrants and comparing them with diagnosis technique.