首页> 外文会议>International conference on nuclear criticality safety >QUANTIFICATION OF CALCULATION ACCURACY FOR CODE SYSTEMS IN BURN-UP CREDIT APPLICATIONS BY RECALCULATIONS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA
【24h】

QUANTIFICATION OF CALCULATION ACCURACY FOR CODE SYSTEMS IN BURN-UP CREDIT APPLICATIONS BY RECALCULATIONS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA

机译:通过重新计算实验数据来量化燃尽信用申请中代码系统的计算准确性

获取原文

摘要

For application in criticality safety, numerical code systems require profound validation against experimental data. In terms of burn-up credit, this refers to the inventory determination as well as the subsequent criticality calculation. Within this framework, a dedicated, conservative estimation of uncertainties, bias and bias uncertainties for the resulting calculated multiplication factor k_(eff) is indispensable. However, measures to reduce excess conservatism may become desirable, depending on the application case. For this reason GRS implemented a methodology to validate a calculation code system for criticality safety analyses for systems with irradiated nuclear fuel. The work at hand demonstrates this methodology by means of the GRS home-built inventory determination system KENOREST and ORNL's well-known SCALE 6 CSAS5 criticality safety calculation sequence. A number of 40 radiochemical analysis samples taken from SFCOMPO and elsewhere have been calculated to derive isotopic correction factors in different ways, depending on the required level of conservatism and the calculational efforts to be carried out. This includes bounding methods as well as different Monte Carlo sampling approaches. Furthermore, from the ICSBEP a number of 515 critical benchmark experiment configurations comprising water moderated low enriched UO_2 fuel rods and water moderated mixed oxide (MOX) fuel rods have been selected and evaluated. Important absorber and structure materials are also covered. Various trending and sensitivity and uncertainty analysis methods have been applied, again to derive conservative estimates on the various contributions to k_(eff) uncertainties. The overall methodology is applicable to low enriched, water moderated PWR uranium dioxide fuels in a burn-up range of about 10 to 60 GWd/tHM, and validates the reactivity contributions of the major uranium and plutonium isotopes. The methodology itself has no limitation which requires the exclusion of further isotopes as e.g. fission products. However, its application is constrained by the experimental database being publicly available. After the potential provision of an extended database in the future, the range of applicability can easily be extended to more nuclides. In addition, it is not limited to the code systems being used here but can also be applied using different numerical tools. For a generic PWR spent fuel pool rack and different enrichment and burn-up combinations, the impact of the current level of validation on k_(eff) is demonstrated and quantified.
机译:为了在临界安全性中应用,数字代码系统需要针对实验数据进行深入验证。在消耗信贷方面,这是指库存确定以及随后的关键性计算。在此框架内,对于得出的计算乘数k_(eff)的不确定性,偏差和偏差不确定性进行专门的保守估计是必不可少的。然而,取决于应用情况,减少多余的保守性的措施可能变得合乎需要。因此,GRS实施了一种方法来验证用于辐照核燃料系统的临界安全性分析的计算代码系统。当前的工作通过GRS家用库存确定系统KENOREST和ORNL著名的SCALE 6 CSAS5临界安全性计算序列来演示此方法。已经计算了从SFCOMPO和其他地方采集的40个放射化学分析样品,以不同的方式得出同位素校正因子,这取决于所需的保守性水平和要进行的计算工作。这包括边界方法以及不同的蒙特卡洛采样方法。此外,已从ICSBEP中选择并评估了515个关键基准实验配置,其中包括水缓和的低浓UO_2燃料棒和水缓和的混合氧化物(MOX)燃料棒。重要的吸收器和结构材料也包括在内。已应用各种趋势,敏感性和不确定性分析方法,再次得出对k_(eff)不确定性的各种贡献的保守估计。总体方法适用于燃耗范围约为10至60 GWd / tHM的低浓缩水调节PWR二氧化铀燃料,并验证了主要铀和p同位素的反应性贡献。该方法学本身没有限制,要求排除其他同位素,例如同位素。裂变产物。但是,其应用受到公开可用的实验数据库的限制。在将来可能提供扩展的数据库之后,可轻松将适用范围扩展到更多的核素。此外,它不仅限于此处使用的代码系统,还可以使用其他数值工具来应用。对于通用的PWR乏燃料池架以及不同的浓缩和燃耗组合,将论证和量化当前验证水平对k_(eff)的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号