首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical review. >Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: Experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors: Commentary
【24h】

Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: Experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors: Commentary

机译:两种无框神经导航系统应用准确性的比较研究:实验误差评估量化注册方法和临床影响因素:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Even though the overall accuracy of neuronavigation systems is <1.5mm, we should always pay attention to brain shift and the other factors which are fluctuating during surgery in real clinical settings. In addition, we should remember the influences of the pressure of head rest of MM apparatus and the gravity to soft tissue of scalp and face those changes depending on patient s position. The important thing is that we should know the characteristics of image guidance systems and rely on a surgeon s final judgment.
机译:即使神经导航系统的整体精度小于1.5毫米,我们仍应始终注意大脑移位和其他在实际临床环境中在手术过程中波动的因素。另外,我们应该记住MM仪器的头枕压力和重力对头皮软组织的影响,并根据患者的位置面对这些变化。重要的是,我们应该了解图像引导系统的特征并依靠外科医生的最终判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号