首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition >MEASURED ROTORDYNAMIC AND LEAKAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TOOTH-ON-ROTOR LABYRINTH SEAL WITH COMPARISONS TO A TOOTH-ON-STATOR LABYRINTH SEAL AND PREDICTIONS
【24h】

MEASURED ROTORDYNAMIC AND LEAKAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TOOTH-ON-ROTOR LABYRINTH SEAL WITH COMPARISONS TO A TOOTH-ON-STATOR LABYRINTH SEAL AND PREDICTIONS

机译:齿上拉贝林密封的测得的转子动力学和泄漏特性,与静齿拉贝林密封和预测的比较

获取原文

摘要

Rotordynamic and leakage data are presented for a see-through tooth-on-rotor (TOR) labyrinth seal with comparisons to a see-through tooth-on-stator (TOS) labyrinth seal. Measurements for both seals are also compared to predictions from XLLaby. Both seals have identical diameter and can be considered as relatively long labyrinth seals. The TOR seal has a length-to-diameter ratio of 0.62, whereas the TOS seal is longer and has a length-to-diameter ratio of 0.75. Both seals also differ by number of teeth, tooth height, and tooth cavity length. TOR labyrinth tests were carried out at an inlet pressure of 70 bar-a (1,015 psia), pressure ratios of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6, rotor speeds up to 20,200 rpm, a radial clearance of 0.1 mm (4 mils), and three preswirl ratios. For comparison, TOS labyrinth tests were run at identical conditions as the TOR tests but for only one positive preswirl ratio. TOR labyrinth measurements show a pronounced dependence of rotordynamic coefficients on rotor speed, especially when compared to prior documented TOS labyrinth seal tests run at a radial clearance of 0.2 mm (8mils). The TOR labyrinth cross-coupled stiffness is higher in magnitude and increases at a higher rate than that of the TOS labyrinth across all test speeds. However, the TOR labyrinth effective damping was determined to be greater due to higher measurements of direct damping. Measured leakage rates for the TOR labyrinth were approximately 5-10% less than the TOS labyrinth. XLLaby underpredicted the rotordynamic coefficients for both seals. However, as with measurements, it predicted the TOR labyrinth to have higher effective damping than the TOS labyrinth.
机译:给出了透明转子上迷宫式密封件的转子动力学和泄漏数据,并与透明定子上迷宫式密封件(TOS)进行了比较。还将两个密封件的测量结果与XLLaby的预测结果进行比较。两种密封件的直径均相同,可以视为相对较长的迷宫式密封件。 TOR密封件的长径比为0.62,而TOS密封件更长,长径比为0.75。两种密封件的齿数,齿高和齿腔长度也不同。 TOR迷宫测试是在70 bar-a(1,015 psia)的入口压力,0.4、0.5和0.6的压力比,高达20,200 rpm的转子转速,0.1 mm(4 mils)的径向游隙以及三个预旋比。为了进行比较,TOS迷宫测试在与TOR测试相同的条件下运行,但仅存在一个正的预旋流比。 TOR迷宫测量显示出转子动力学系数对转子速度的显着依赖性,尤其是与先前记录的TOS迷宫密封测试相比,径向间隙为0.2毫米(8密耳)时更是如此。在所有测试速度下,TOR迷宫的交叉耦合刚度在数量级上都比TOS迷宫的更高,并且以更高的速率增加。但是,由于直接阻尼的测量值较高,因此确定TOR迷宫有效阻尼更大。 TOR迷宫的测得泄漏率比TOS迷宫低约5-10%。 XLLaby低估了两个密封件的转子动力学系数。但是,与测量一样,它预测TOR迷宫比TOS迷宫具有更高的有效阻尼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号