首页> 外文会议>AIAA space and astronautics forum and exposition >A Prognostic Launch Vehicle Probability of Failure Assessment Methodology for Conceptual Systems Predicated on Human Causal Factors
【24h】

A Prognostic Launch Vehicle Probability of Failure Assessment Methodology for Conceptual Systems Predicated on Human Causal Factors

机译:对人因因子预测概念系统失败评估方法的预后发射车辆概率

获取原文

摘要

Lessons learned from past failures of launch vehicle developments and operations were used to create a new method to predict the probability of failure of conceptual systems. Existing methods such as Probabilistic Risk Assessments and Human Risk Assessments were considered but found to be too cumbersome for this type of system-wide application for yet-to-be-flown vehicles. The basis for this methodology were historic databases of past failures, where it was determined that various faulty human-interactions were the predominant root causes of failure rather than deficient component reliabilities evaluated through statistical analysis. This methodology contains an expert scoring part which can be used in either a qualitative or a quantitative mode. The method produces two products: a numerical score of the probability of failure or guidance to program management on critical areas in need of increased focus to improve the probability of success. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of this new method, data from a concluded vehicle program (USAF's Titan Ⅳ with the Centaur G-Prime upper stage) was used as a test case. Although the theoretical vs. actual probability of failure was found to be in reasonable agreement (4.46% vs. 6.67% respectively) the underlying sub-root cause scoring had significant disparities attributable to significant organizational changes and acquisitions. Recommendations are made for future applications of this method to ongoing launch vehicle development programs.
机译:从发射车辆开发和运营的过去失败中汲取的经验教训用于创建一种预测概念系统失败的概率的新方法。诸如概率风险评估和人类风险评估等现有方法,但发现对这种类型的缺陷车辆的全系统应用程序来说太麻烦了。该方法的基础是过去失败的历史数据库,在那里确定各种故障的人类相互作用是失败的主要原因,而不是通过统计分析评估的缺陷组分可靠性。该方法包含一个专家评分部分,可以以定性或定量模式使用。该方法产生两种产品:对需要增加重点的关键领域的失败或指导概率的数值分数,以提高成功的概率。为了评估这种新方法的有效性,从A结束的车辆程序(USAF的泰坦ⅳ与半个半岛上阶段)的数据用作测试用例。虽然理论与失败的实际概率被发现合理协议(分别为4.46%,分别为6.67%)潜在的亚根根原因评分因重大组织变更和收购而具有显着的差异。建议采用该方法对正在进行的推动车辆开发计划的未来应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号