首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems;International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems >Two-objective solution set optimization to maximize hypervolume and decision space diversity in multiobjective optimization
【24h】

Two-objective solution set optimization to maximize hypervolume and decision space diversity in multiobjective optimization

机译:两个目标解决方案设置优化,以最大化多目标优化中的超高型和决策空间分集

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Diversity maintenance in the decision space is a recent hot topic in the field of evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO). In this paper, we propose the use of a decision space diversity measure as an objective function in a two-objective formulation of solution set optimization where the hypervolume measure is used as the other objective. In the proposed approach, a given multiobjective problem with an arbitrary number of objectives is handled as a two-objective solution set optimization problem. A solution of our two-objective problem is a set of non-dominated solutions of the original multiobjective problem. An EMO algorithm is used to search for a number of solution sets along the tradeoff surface between the diversity maximization in the decision space and the hypervolume maximization in the objective space. In this paper, first we numerically examine the diversity measure of Solow & Polasky (1994), which was used in recent studies of Ulrich et al. (2010, 2011), through computational experiments on many-objective distance minimization problems in a two-dimensional decision space. Then we formulate a two-objective solution set optimization problem to maximize the decision space diversity and the objective space hypervolume. Finally we demonstrate that a number of non-dominated solution sets can be obtained along the diversity-hypervolume tradeoff surface. Through computational experiments, we also examine the difference between the following two settings for diversity calculation: All solutions in a solution set are used in one setting while only non-dominated solutions are used in the other setting.
机译:决策空间的多样性维护是进化多目标优化领域的最近热门话题(EMO)。在本文中,我们提出了在解决方案集优化的双目标配方中作为目标函数的使用决定空间分集措施,其中超级型测量作为另一个目的。在所提出的方法中,具有任意数量的目标的给定的多目标问题被处理为两个目标解决方案设置优化问题。我们的两个客观问题的解决方案是原始多目标问题的一组非主导解决方案。 EMO算法用于在决策空间中的分集最大化和客观空间中的超高化最大化之间搜索沿着折衷表面的多个解决方案集。在本文中,首先,我们在数值上检查了索诺和麦克拉多(1994)的多样性测量,其在最近的Ulrich等人的研究中使用。 (2010年,2010年),通过计算实验对二维决策空间的许多客观距离最小化问题。然后,我们制定了一个双目标解决方案设置优化问题,以最大化决策空间分集和客观空间超级化。最后,我们证明可以沿着多样性 - 超型折衷表面获得许多非主导的解决方案集。通过计算实验,我们还研究了以下两种多样性计算设置之间的差异:解决方案集中的所有解决方案都在一个设置中使用,而在其他设置中仅使用非主导的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号