首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >A COMPARISON OF NOTCH FAILURE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF STRUCTURES CONTAINING NON-SHARP DEFECTS
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF NOTCH FAILURE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF STRUCTURES CONTAINING NON-SHARP DEFECTS

机译:评估包含非锋利缺陷的结构的断裂抗力的缺口破坏评估图方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper analyses and compares a range of Notch Failure Assessment Diagram (NFAD) methods for assessing the fracture resistance of structures and components that contain defects with non-sharp tips. As micromechanistic failure criteria for predicting fracture from notch tips have developed, several forms of NFADs have been proposed over the last 20 years with notable developments having been made in the last 10 years. This paper quantifies the differences between four different types of NFAD approach and uses test results from test specimens containing notches of varying acuities to evaluate each approach. The results highlight significant differences in fracture predictions between the different NFAD approaches due to differences in the definition of the NFAD axes, the failure loci, the assumed failure mechanism and the corresponding micromechanistic failure criteria employed by each method.
机译:本文分析并比较了一系列“缺口失效评估图”(NFAD)方法,以评估带有非锋利尖端的缺陷的结构和组件的抗断裂性能。随着从缺口尖端预测断裂的微机械失效标准的发展,在过去的20年中已经提出了几种形式的NFAD,并且在最近的10年中取得了显着的进展。本文对四种不同类型的NFAD方法之间的差异进行了量化,并使用包含不同敏锐度的缺口的试样的测试结果来评估每种方法。结果表明,由于NFAD轴的定义,失效位点,假定的失效机制以及每种方法所采用的相应的微机械失效准则的差异,不同NFAD方法之间的裂缝预测存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号