【24h】

The resolution of failing banks: Bail-out or bail-in?

机译:破产银行的解决方案:纾困还是纾困?

获取原文

摘要

Prior to the Lehman failure, most large failing banks were rescued by an encouraged merger with a stronger bank. That route has now become more difficult. Because of the dangers of liquidating any large bank, the aim will be to recapitalise them. In the past this has been done by bail-out. This has led to many objections, on grounds of moral hazard, unfairness to taxpayers, and leading to a sovereign/bank ‘doom-loop’. So there is a drive to shift the burden of recapitalisation onto creditors, i.e. bail-in. But this, too, will have numerous problems, several of which have not (yet) been fully appreciated.
机译:雷曼兄弟倒闭之前,大多数大型倒闭的银行都通过与实力较强的银行的鼓励合并而获救。这条路线现在变得更加困难。由于清算任何大型银行的危险,其目的是对它们进行资本重组。过去,这是通过纾困来实现的。出于道德风险,对纳税人不公平的理由,这导致了许多反对,并导致了主权/银行的“死循环”。因此,有一种将资本重组的负担转移到债权人上的动力,即保释金。但是,这也将有许多问题,其中一些尚未(尚未)得到充分认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号