首页> 外文会议>Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium >Integration of capacity factors analysis risk methodology and Ostrom's social ecological system assessment framework to assess and improve domestic water infrastructure in Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India
【24h】

Integration of capacity factors analysis risk methodology and Ostrom's social ecological system assessment framework to assess and improve domestic water infrastructure in Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India

机译:容量因素的整合分析风险方法和欧洲社会生态系统评估框架,以评估和改进Nalgonda区的国内水基础设施,印度邦德拉邦

获取原文

摘要

Over the past 50 years, both financing and socio-economic considerations in South India have shifted heavily towards improving urban infrastructure, causing rural services to be left behind. A recent report released by WHO and UNICEF states that over 884 million people, 84% of whom live in rural areas, use “unimproved water sources” for domestic purposes. This paper considers the case study of Nalgonda, a district to the east of Hyderabad, India. Nalgonda struggles with three main issues concerning domestic water: high fluoride levels in groundwater have caused thousands of cases of dental and skeletal fluorosis; second, over two-thirds of Nalgonda does not meet the WHO-requirement of 40 liters per capita daily of domestic water supply; third, poor management and maintenance have increased the risk of failure of existing water infrastructure. The state has been pursuing these issues in conjunction with a multi-district irrigation project that taps the regional Nagarjuna Sagar Dam. Centralized water supply, treatment, and distribution services are appropriate for high population density areas; however, geographical expanse and sparse populations lead to onerous access to improved water sources and inhibit the success of a similar centralized framework in rural areas. This is compounded by a lack of ownership at the habitation and socio-cultural levels. Further, the current water network and its problems — including inconsistent service, corruption, and general distrust of the treated Sagar water — have emboldened wealthier citizens to build private, unregulated groundwater defluoridation plants and commercialize small-scale water businesses. Inequitable services and uncertainty of shared water resources have caused a “tragedy of the commons,” leading to growing disparity and a severely receding water table. This research proposes the Louis-Ostrom Comprehensive Capacity Assessment (LOCCA) tool — an integration of- - the quantitative Capacity Factors Analysis risk methodology and the qualitative Ostrom's framework for assessing socio-ecological systems (SESs). The new framework is used to provide a sample assessment of the Vaillapally habitation in Narayanpur Mandal, Nalgonda. Preliminary results indicate that the institutional, technical, and socio-cultural capacity factors must progress to meet the policymakers' current projects technical capacity. Alternatively, decentralized systems, such as rainwater harvesting technology, better serve rural areas with low capacity and demand, while increasing collective investment in village-scale systems.
机译:在过去的50年中,印度南部的融资和社会经济考虑都大幅转向改善城市基础设施,导致农村服务落后。最近由世卫组织和儿童基金会发布的报告称,超过884万人,其中84%的人住在农村地区,使用“未经改善的水源”用于国内目的。本文考虑了印度海德拉巴东地区Nalgonda的案例研究。 Nalgonda努力与国内水的三个主要问题斗争:地下水的高氟化物水平造成数千例牙齿和骨骼氟化症;其次,超过三分之二的Nalgonda并不符合每日国内供水每日40升的人需求;第三,管理和维护差增加了现有水基础设施失败的风险。国家一直在追求这些问题与多区灌溉项目一起攻击区域Nagarjuna Sagar大坝。集中供水,治疗和配送服务适用于高人口密度区域;然而,地理扩张和稀疏的人口导致繁重的进入改善的水源,并抑制农村地区类似集中框架的成功。这通过居住和社会文化层面缺乏所有权,这是复杂的。此外,目前的水网络及其问题 - 包括对治疗的Sagar水的不一致服务,腐败和一般不信任 - 已经使富裕的公民变得越来越富裕的公民,并将小型水企业商业化。共享水资源的不公平的服务和不确定性导致了“公共的悲剧,”导致差距增长和严重后退的水位。本研究提出了路易斯 - 欧洲综合能力评估(Locca)工具 - - - 定量容量因素分析风险方法和定性欧瑟姆评估社会生态系统(Sess)的框架的整合。新框架用于提供Narayanpur Mandal,Nalgonda的Vaillapally居住的样本评估。初步结果表明,制度,技术和社会文化能力因素必须取得进展,以满足政策制定者目前的项目技术能力。或者,分散的系统,如雨水收获技术,更好地为农村地区提供低容量和需求,同时越来越多的村庄规模系统的集体投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号