首页> 外文会议>AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference >Longitudinal Control Strategy for Hypersonic Accelerating Vehicles
【24h】

Longitudinal Control Strategy for Hypersonic Accelerating Vehicles

机译:高超音速加速器的纵向控制策略

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Recent work on small scale access to space systems found that by incorporating a scramjet powered stage into the launch stack the percent payload into orbit can be improved significantly over conventional rocket only systems. However, in order to gain the most out of the airbreathing stage the flight dynamic pressure across the accelerating trajectory becomes an important design consideration. If it is too high then the structural loading and aerodynamic heating can be excessive, if it is too low scramjet performance will suffer and unreasonably large wings will be required to generate enough lift. A common compromise is to fly a constant dynamic pressure trajectory. This paper presents and compares three dynamic pressure controller methodologies that were developed for a scaled down version of the winged cone vehicle developed by NASA during the 90s. The controllers investigated are a constant gain PID, a gain scheduling PID and a pole placement PI. The performances of the controllers are demonstrated along a 50kPa dynamic pressure accelerating trajectory. It is shown that a unique criteria that must be satisfied is an initial flight path angle that satisfies a zero rate of change in dynamic pressure, and an underlying angle of attack for 'lift equals weight'.
机译:最近在小规模进入太空系统方面的工作发现,通过将超燃冲压发动机驱动的级结合到发射堆栈中,与传统的仅使用火箭的系统相比,可以显着改善进入轨道的有效载荷百分比。但是,为了从呼吸阶段获得最大收益,加速轨迹上的飞行动态压力成为重要的设计考虑因素。如果太高,则结构载荷和空气动力加热可能会过度,如果太低,则超燃冲压发动机的性能会受到损害,并且需要不合理的大机翼才能产生足够的升力。一个常见的折衷方案是飞行恒定的动态压力轨迹。本文介绍并比较了90年代为NASA开发的按比例缩小版本的圆锥锥飞行器开发的三种动态压力控制器方法。研究的控制器为恒定增益PID,增益调度PID和极点PI。沿50kPa动态压力加速轨迹演示了控制器的性能。结果表明,必须满足的唯一标准是:初始飞行路径角满足动态压力的零变化率,以及“升力等于重量”的潜在迎角。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号