首页> 外文会议>Offshore Technology Conference >Comparative Economic and Technical Evaluation of AG FGTL Floating Gas to Liquid Vessel vs. AG FLNG
【24h】

Comparative Economic and Technical Evaluation of AG FGTL Floating Gas to Liquid Vessel vs. AG FLNG

机译:AG FGTL浮动气体对液体容器的比较经济和技术评价与AG FLNG

获取原文

摘要

This study presents a comparative evaluation of a Floating Gas to Liquid Facility (FGTL) and a Floating Liquid Natural gas Facility (FLNG) as a way to monetize Associated Gas (AG) from existing oil producing offshore fields or from remote offshore gas fields. The study aims at showing that the FGTL is an option to be considered as a way to monetize AG. For this purpose, a previous study presented to the OMAE under OMAE2016 – 55152 is used for the FLNG with one liquefaction train for nitrogen refrigerant. This FLNG concept serves as a benchmark to evaluate the technical and economic relevance of the FGTL through the Net Present Value (NPV) of the Life Cycle Cost (LCC). The LCC compares the difference between the FGTL and the FLNG NPVs on the basis of a selling price for the gasoline of 1.4, 2.0 and 2.4 USD/Gal with a price for the LNG varying from 3.5 to 7.5 USD/MMBTU.
机译:该研究介绍了浮动气体到液体设施(FGT1)和浮动液体天然气设施(FLNG)的比较评估,作为从生产海上场或远程近海气田的现有石油中金属(AG)的一种方式。该研究旨在表明FGTL是一种被视为可将AG的方式视为一种方式。为此目的,在OMAE2016-55152下呈现给omae的先前研究用于具有用于氮制冷剂的一个液化火车的FLNG。该FLNG概念用作基准,以通过生命周期成本(LCC)的净现值(NPV)评估FGTL的技术和经济相关性。 LCC基于1.4,2.0和2.4美元/加仑的汽油的销售价格比较FGTL和FLNG NPV之间的差异,其LNG从3.5到7.5美元/ mmbtu的价格变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号