首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications >Performance analysis and modeling of congestion control algorithms based on active queue management
【24h】

Performance analysis and modeling of congestion control algorithms based on active queue management

机译:基于活动队列管理的拥塞控制算法性能分析与建模

获取原文

摘要

We have considered various types of congestion control algorithms. Each congestion algorithm has its own advantages and it would vary from parameters to parameters. Random Early Detection (RED) is more focused on queue length and BLUE is care about loss of packets. In this paper we have found the problems with existing congestion control algorithms. We have tried to show their performance of RED, SFQ, and REM in terms of performance parameters i.e. delay, throughput, loss rate etc. for our considered network configurations. Similarly BLUE and Random Exponential Marking (REM) are more focused on packet loss and mismatch respectively, mismatch occurring in REM due to either input rate and link capacity or queue length and target. In order to restrict the rising packet loss rates caused by network traffic, active queue management technique such as REM has come into picture. Flow Random Early Drop (FRED) keeps state information based on instantaneous queue occupancy of a given flow. Stochastic Fair Queuing (SFQ) ensures fair access to network resources and prevents a busty flow from consuming more than its fair share. Stabilized RED (SRED) is another approach of detecting nonresponsive flows. In this paper, we proposed a model to calculate dropping probability and packet loss for Active Queue Management (AQM). At the last, we have shown a comparative analysis of the loss delay product (LDP) as a new parameter of performance measure obtained from simulation on ns2 for different AQM algorithms. It has been observed that performance parameters are varying according to the various congestion algorithms used in the simulation. RED achieved the best result in terms of the delay but in terms of throughput, loss ratio, and utilization REM shows the best results in this network configuration. But, RED performed best at low link capacity in terms of new measured parameter LDP.
机译:我们考虑了各种类型的拥塞控制算法。每个拥塞算法都有自己的优点,它将因参数而异。随机早期检测(红色)更专注于队列长度,蓝色关心数据包丢失。在本文中,我们已经发现了现有拥塞控制算法的问题。我们试图在性能参数中展示红色,SFQ和REM的表现,即我们考虑的网络配置的延迟,吞吐量,损失等。类似地,蓝色和随机指数标记(REM)分别更专注于分组丢失和不匹配,由于输入速率和链路容量或队列长度和目标而在REM中发生不匹配。为了限制网络流量引起的上升丢失率,REM等活动队列管理技术已进入图片。流动随机早期下降(FRED)基于给定流程的瞬时队列占用来保持状态信息。随机公平队列(SFQ)确保公平访问网络资源,并防止丰满的流量消耗超过其公平份额。稳定的红色(Sred)是检测非反应流动的另一种方法。在本文中,我们提出了一种模型来计算活动队列管理(AQM)的丢弃概率和丢包。最后,我们已经示出了对损耗延迟产品(LDP)的比较分析,作为从不同AQM算法的NS2上的模拟获得的性能措施的新参数。已经观察到,性能参数根据模拟中使用的各种拥塞算法而变化。红色实现了延迟的最佳结果,但在吞吐量,损失比率方面,利用率REM显示出该网络配置中的最佳结果。但是,在新的测量参数LDP方面,红色在低链路容量中表现最佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号