首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications >Performance analysis and modeling of congestion control algorithms based on active queue management
【24h】

Performance analysis and modeling of congestion control algorithms based on active queue management

机译:基于主动队列管理的拥塞控制算法性能分析与建模

获取原文

摘要

We have considered various types of congestion control algorithms. Each congestion algorithm has its own advantages and it would vary from parameters to parameters. Random Early Detection (RED) is more focused on queue length and BLUE is care about loss of packets. In this paper we have found the problems with existing congestion control algorithms. We have tried to show their performance of RED, SFQ, and REM in terms of performance parameters i.e. delay, throughput, loss rate etc. for our considered network configurations. Similarly BLUE and Random Exponential Marking (REM) are more focused on packet loss and mismatch respectively, mismatch occurring in REM due to either input rate and link capacity or queue length and target. In order to restrict the rising packet loss rates caused by network traffic, active queue management technique such as REM has come into picture. Flow Random Early Drop (FRED) keeps state information based on instantaneous queue occupancy of a given flow. Stochastic Fair Queuing (SFQ) ensures fair access to network resources and prevents a busty flow from consuming more than its fair share. Stabilized RED (SRED) is another approach of detecting nonresponsive flows. In this paper, we proposed a model to calculate dropping probability and packet loss for Active Queue Management (AQM). At the last, we have shown a comparative analysis of the loss delay product (LDP) as a new parameter of performance measure obtained from simulation on ns2 for different AQM algorithms. It has been observed that performance parameters are varying according to the various congestion algorithms used in the simulation. RED achieved the best result in terms of the delay but in terms of throughput, loss ratio, and utilization REM shows the best results in this network configuration. But, RED performed best at low link capacity in terms of new measured parameter LDP.
机译:我们已经考虑了各种类型的拥塞控制算法。每种拥塞算法都有其自身的优势,并且会因参数而异。随机早期检测(RED)更加关注队列长度,而BLUE关注数据包的丢失。在本文中,我们发现了现有的拥塞控制算法存在的问题。我们已经尝试根据性能参数(即延迟,吞吐量,丢失率等)针对我们考虑的网络配置显示RED,SFQ和REM的性能。类似地,BLUE和随机指数标记(REM)分别更侧重于数据包丢失和不匹配,由于输入速率和链路容量或队列长度和目标,在REM中发生不匹配。为了限制由网络流量引起的上升的丢包率,主动队列管理技术(例如REM)已成为人们的关注。流随机早期丢弃(FRED)根据给定流的瞬时队列占用率来保留状态信息。随机公平排队(SFQ)确保公平访问网络资源,并防止繁忙流量消耗的资源超过其公平份额。稳定RED(SRED)是检测无响应流的另一种方法。在本文中,我们提出了一个模型来计算主动队列管理(AQM)的丢弃概率和数据包丢失。最后,我们展示了对损耗延迟乘积(LDP)的比较分析,该损耗延迟乘积是通过针对不同AQM算法在ns2上进行仿真而获得的性能度量的新参数。已经观察到,性能参数根据模拟中使用的各种拥塞算法而变化。在延迟方面,RED取得了最佳结果,但在吞吐量,损耗率和利用率方面,REM在此网络配置中显示出了最佳结果。但是,就新的测量参数LDP而言,RED在低链路容量下性能最佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号