首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Professional Communication Conference >What does professional communication research have to do with social justice? Intersections and sources of resistance
【24h】

What does professional communication research have to do with social justice? Intersections and sources of resistance

机译:专业沟通研究与社会正义有什么关系? 交叉口和抵抗源

获取原文

摘要

A brief review of literature indicates that professional communication scholars have had a complex, veiled relation with social justice. It is important to better understand the origins of that relation. After briefly contrasting the degree to which social justice has been explicitly integrated in professional communication and three related disciplines, this paper describes potential sources of resistance to incorporating social justice constructs into professional communication research. In professional communication, these sources of resistance are associated with ideologies that circulate within engineering, scientific, and technical contexts: the apolitical myth, ingroup bias, and technical-social dualism. In addition to exploring those three reasons why professional communication researchers generally avoid foregrounding social justice as an explicit component of their research, the paper also considers deviations from that norm by describing the work of pioneers who are integrating social justice in professional communication research. The implications of these pioneers will be discussed.
机译:简要回顾文学表明,专业沟通学者与社会正义有着复杂的暗示关系。更好地了解该关系的起源。在将社会正义明确融合在专业沟通和三个相关学科中的程度简单后,本文介绍了将社会正义构建融入专业沟通研究的潜在抵抗来源。在专业沟通中,这些阻力来源与在工程,科学和技术背景下传播的意识形态有关:非政治性神话,INGROUP偏见和技术社会二元论。除了探索这三个原因,为什么专业沟通研究人员普遍避免前景社会正义作为他们的研究的明确组成部分,本文还考虑了通过描述在专业沟通研究中整合社会正义的先驱的工作来偏离这一规范。将讨论这些先驱的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号