首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Professional Communication Conference >A contrast in responses to the unspeakable events of September 11: American airlines vs. united airlines
【24h】

A contrast in responses to the unspeakable events of September 11: American airlines vs. united airlines

机译:对9月11日未标记活动的响应的对比:美国航空公司与美国航空公司

获取原文

摘要

September 11, 2001, is a date that has caused nearly everyone in the civilized world to reflect on all elements of life and work Certainly, the events of that day caused a multitude of corporate communicators to reflect on their communication strategies, and in particular, on their Crisis Response Plans. This extraordinary event was a most severe test of how well these plans stood up. The events of September 11 were a national disaster in which two airlines had their planes used as weapons in a most horrendous terrorist attack against the United States. Instead of one terrible crash, there were four. Instead of relatives and friends of one planeload of passengers to communicate with, there were four - with the world looking on. With all of the political, financial, and emotional implications of these crashes, imagine the crisis communication task that American Airlines and United Airlines had to cope with. This paper examines the first twenty four hours of press releases from the two airlines and analyzes what they tell us about how well each airline seemed to be prepared for a disaster of this magnitude. Coombs' crisis response strategies are the basis for the analysis.
机译:2001年9月11日,是一个日期,造成了文明世界中的几乎所有人,以反思生活中的所有要素,肯定地工作,那一天的事件导致了众多的企业沟通者反思他们的沟通战略,特别是关于他们的危机反应计划。这种非凡的事件是最严重的是,这些计划的目标是如何站立的。 9月11日的事件是一个国家灾难,其中两家航空公司将其飞机用作对美国最可怕的恐怖主义攻击中的武器。而不是一个可怕的崩溃,有四个。而不是一个乘客的一个乘客的亲戚和朋友沟通,有四个 - 世界看着。随着这些崩溃的所有政治,金融和情感影响,想象着美国航空公司和联合航空公司必须应付的危机沟通任务。本文审查了来自两家航空公司的前二十四小时的新闻发布,并分析了他们告诉我们每个航空公司似乎为这一幅度准备的灾难做准备的内容。 Coombs的危机反应策略是分析的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号